

Iraan, TX is a real place, though it’s pronounced “Ira-Ann.”
Iraan is the second largest town in the second largest county in the second largest state in the United States, which is the second largest country in North America.
“We’re Number 2!”


Iraan, TX is a real place, though it’s pronounced “Ira-Ann.”
Iraan is the second largest town in the second largest county in the second largest state in the United States, which is the second largest country in North America.
“We’re Number 2!”


Looks like they got Iraan, TX correct
The 1936 USSR Constitution was immediately followed by The Great Purge and only lasted 40 years


You’re just going around saying “correlation doesn’t equal causation” to everything regardless of context. Feel free to expound.
No, there definitely isn’t “a gene” for schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, just like there isn’t “a gene” for hair or eye color, two other traits that are highly heritable.
Here’s just one source for you on this, and there are many more if you care to take a look:


I’m not understanding your argument. What about this is correlation and not causation? The body of literature indicating cannabis negatively impacts the mental health of people prone to developing psychosis is pretty extensive, and this is measured against other people who are prone to developing psychosis but who do not use cannabis


Additionally, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are both heritable conditions, and if a parent or grandparent has one of these diagnoses, the family is significantly more likely to also be experiencing poverty or other adverse events, which in turn makes it more likely that the predisposed child will develop the inherited condition.


More specifically, for someone who has a genetic predisposition to developing schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, cannabis use will make it more likely that you yourself will develop that condition. If you have someone in your family with schizophrenia or bipolar, you would do well to avoid cannabis use, especially as a teenager or young adult.


I think that’s a huge leap. Talarico’s positions are way left of the Democratic establishment, why would they be more “scared” of Crockett than him? He’s got Zionist groups actively campaigning against him because he’s forthright about the Gaza genocide. He’s setting his campaign up against the wealthy and openly criticizing the Democratic party’s subservience to wealthy donors. There just isn’t that much difference between their political positions, and I don’t get your angle.
Here’s a recent headline:
Texas Jewish voters alarmed by James Talarico’s Israel rhetoric
Local leaders said that, without improved outreach from Talarico to address their concerns, they’re likely to vote for Rep. Jasmine Crockett in the Democratic primary


I agree, though after listening to both of them a bunch, I’m supporting Talarico in this election. I hope to continue to see Crockett’s star rise though


You can still (and should) watch it on YouTube!
Rep. James Talarico On Confronting Christian Nationalism, And Strange Days In The Texas Legislature
Edit: If you feel so inclined, you can donate to his US Senate campaign here: https://secure.actblue.com/donate/jt-tx-web


It’s much more likely this fell out of someone’s pocket during the festivities


Oh, is Mike Lindell reentering the ring? That guy never disappoints


This has become the culture at many if not most large companies. Only the people who are willing to totally debase themselves and incessantly parrot the company line rise to the top, and that has an inverse relationship with talent.


What evidence is there of that?
And are you implying Kid Rock hasn’t gotten plastic surgery?


What, you don’t like being manfluenced? Something off-putting to you about manfluence? What’s wrong with being a manfluencing manfluencer?


When I was little, we’d listen to music while the TV was on and laugh when their mouths lined up with the words, which happened a lot

I’d like to hear more about Steve Bannon’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. How many times is he in the Epstein files again?

Bill Clinton is a very skilled communicator and has little to lose. House Republicans may have bitten off more than they can chew with this one


I literally said overture in the comment that’s got you all bothered
Oil