Does that translate to more videos being uploaded?

I do appreciate someone posting a video from my favorite Peertube platform, over Youtube. Those findings are a sign of a sudden takeover from within.

The heading sounds interesting. If they develop it well will we be able to communicate with dolphins with this ai tech? Or does it already work?

How can Lemmy or Mastodon become more centralized like email, if it is the users who are signing up to the top largest servers. Users naturally might be attracted to servers with higher user counts.

compared to everything else besides email, 50 or above looks good when you don’t have as much competition aiming to get to 100%

If users go to the defualt server, while things are federated, Mastodon and Lemmy already did their service by using activity pub.

It just seems like possibly we need to more so, educate users why going to the largest server could be a negative thing potentially leading to a monopoly. On one note, Lemmy.world isn’t a defualt server, while lemmy.ml was. So at least Lemmy is doing better in that regard while Mastodon.social, a default/official server from the original devs of Mastodon, could prove being even more concentrating them the trend on Lemmy where users might g to lemmy.world.

Ideally I’d like to see all types of different servers have user activity, but with a low user count, to make this more liley to happen the word about Fediverse needs to be advertised and spread around. So more people can discover it.

I feel like somehow advertising it at local libraries would acually help it go up in discoverability on poster or billboards etc.

What’s considered an acceptable score on this? After looking at Lemmy and Mastodon barely making half the score.

There’s also character ai among others. Status AI isn’t exactly the first “AI Social Media”.

As an aromantic person, under the ‘a’ umbrella of LGBTQ+ I think if parents can prevent kids from just simply exploring their attractions or their gender identity can be a form of suppression. If the kid wanted to explore it on their own, it’s different as if the thing was forced on them. In a way Christianity, had been forced on millions to an extent. If you’re following the law just to protect yourself legally with some decisions you may make for your child I guess that might be more acceptable then forcing a religious Bible that we don’t know is actually real or not.

In the case of this ruling, I just… think that this is based on a book written at one point of time by a group of people. A fairy tale, and used as an excuse for parents to suppress people they don’t want to be seen or to exist. Whether they are doing it in legit hate or whether they truly believe in what the Bible is saying in the Christian sense is true, they are really just suppressing these groups of people. Intentional or not, they are suppressing them from existing and expressing themselves.