:)

None really, it’s hyperbole. I do think it is meant to be a joke about Mamdani though

How the hell do you pronounce pin different from pen

Thank

The left and right wing of the same eagle

Honestly don’t see this as gay shaming. Thats just how fascist (and many of the terminally online generally) name themselves on twitter sometimes

Largest petroleum producer in Africa and second largest petroleum deposits in Africa.

Holy shit

Consider who this mentality benefits most. Things are certainly going to get very awful, but as they get worse there will come a time when those most responsible are held accountable, one way or another. The sooner this occurs the more people are likely to survive. Yes, a vast many, maybe even most of us could perish, but retreating into doomerism, choosing to do nothing, means prolonging the worlds destitution by postponing change. Humans, as a collective, are not a species that likes to give up, the sooner we do something the more lives we save, even if it is just a few. I will not blame you for forsaking the collective in order to preserve the individual but pushing that mentality to others could do real harm. The only people who benefit from this choice are those responsible for our doom.

Because blaming the individual has gotten us so far already

a) I will fight anti-colonialism at home until I am able to flee. I feel guilty to admit but a large part of my desire to leave is for personal safety. I strongly believe that I will end up killed or indefinitely imprisoned by the state within the next decade. Unfortunately I am very doomer about prospects for indigenous folks in the US. I don’t see any chance of a non-fascist US anytime soon. An anti-colonial future will not come from within the imperial core it will come from without. Hopefully I can contribute my labor to that effort from a position of relative safety outside of the empire. It is selfish and I do feel incredibly conflicted about this but I don’t want my partner to suffer for my convictions if I can help it.

b) I do actually have some indigenous heritage but it is highly negligable. A far off ancestor who more than likely did not consent from what we can tell. I would never consider myself indigenous as I was not raised within their culture whatsoever.

It isn’t problematic in the sense that I have done something wrong as an individual but I don’t want to be part of a settler colonial project in any capacity even if it is one that has long since “succeeded” in displacing its native population. I’m interested in Denmark, northern China, or Ireland in no particular order and for very different reasons. I have critiques of all of them, especially Denmark but all are preferable to the US. All are a long process to emmigrate to unfortunately.

I was born here unfortunately

As soon as I am able

Love when you post stuff like this

also it wasn’t invented, it manifested itself out of chaos.

So like javascript?

Idk its kinda cool, never seen anyone do that before

You know the lesser evil is also ripping families apart right? What part of organize directly did you not understand? You don’t have to just watch.

Honestly, it’s very difficult to imagine and while there is plenty of literature on the subject I don’t think any of us can truly say. I personally have not read the literature and for me to speculate on it would do more harm than good I think. The reality of a stateless society seems so far off from my lifetime that discussing how it might look feels like fantasizing to me. My focus has always been on getting to a point where one is possible and studying how to do so as this is far more relevant to my conditions.

Stateless societies absolutely have existed. The state had to arise at some point. Foraging and horticultural groups are examples of this but neither can sustain our current human population so no they are not practical in the way you are asking. There were also attempts at utopian communism that were internally stateless but ultimately subject to the whims of whatever state they resided in so their status as stateless is debatable. You won’t find a largescale stateless society in the modern era primarily because it would make them incredibly vulnerable. Proposing, hypothetically, you eliminate class within a large industrialized society and therefore internally remove the requirement for a state, that society is still beholden to the global dynamic of imperialism. The state is still required to protect the interests of their society from the contradicting interests of capital abroad. This is why communism must be an international struggle.