sircac

As if an user could be interested in pursue such enlighten…

The same country would lend a nuke to Iran? What a timeline…

You are right, thanks! I misread the graph and thought it was a 4 cycles per day, which was puzzling me, but is indeed just a daily oscillation

Intrigued by the quarter a day oscillation in that graph… 🤔

Next thing: “out law hurricanes” …good luck with all that

Not to mention that plan and engagement of the NYT story is purely based on writers and potential readers relating to such fact, behave as if it is something worth of mentioning in a story in the first place borders hypocrisy… they forgot their first time got access to unlimited internet

I liked the pareidolia :D

Sounds like some insecurities need reaffirmation…

I picture one day of his childhood in which he was mocked by everyone at school when he misnamed things in geography class and now we live in this timeline when he claims revenge…

…a pack of remotes gather during mating session

Nah, they keep engaging… even harder…

Hate and Love, sure…

Comment quality is also very well balanced…

Being skeptic is not bad. Not seek nor relay on scientific evidences is the problem…

Texting a video, oh my, that must have been exhausting per se but with the touchscreen smartphone keyboard it seems even more epic, to write so many 0s and 1s… kudos also for the receiver that translated the binary into a reproducible format…

Well, there is probably some survival/confirmation bias on that statistics, those answers are the funny ones… in any case probably is not necessary a LLM to state such statements

A LLM can “reveal” also that water ice melts into mapple syrup given the proper prompts, if people already can (consciously and not) lie proportionally to their biases I don’t understand why would somebody treat a LLM output as a fact…

I am known as Bark Bark…

My name Is Nobody (Il mio nome è Nessuno)