

Sure, but don’t even ask about my ligma
Sure, but don’t even ask about my ligma
My dogma defines my in-group, and my in-group can’t be wrong because then that would mean that I am wrong, which I categorically can’t be. And even if I was wrong, then I would no longer be part of my in-group. Therefore, your science and logic and proof must be wrong if it contradicts my dogma.
“Nanook” is a slur for northern indigenous people in the same way “Chan” is a slur for Chinese people. Sure, there might be some members of that demographic with that name, but using the term as a generalization for that demographic is derogatory in intent.
Using the term “Eskimo” in the instance name is problematic for at least two reasons.
The term itself is considered problematic and derogatory for reasons I don’t have time to go into here, but feel free to research why it’s under fire.
I haven’t checked, but the admins are probably not part of the demographics that the term would refer to, so they’re not “reclaiming a slur” so to speak
Your username is a racial slur and your host instance’s name contains a racial pejorative. What other varieties of bigotry do you partake in?
“Yes, the only social media I have is TruthSocial. All other platforms are too woke”
Damn bro just solved the Fermi Paradox with a Dilbert punchline