Mine are all GPLv3 or forks of other repos and they are listed. I’m sanguine because the license allows for study and if it’s good enough for humans I don’t see why it’s not for clankers.

I mean scientists have been going on about global warming for some time now and no one seemed to listen to them then. Not sure why they are turning to scientists now.

I’ve long been off the critical path because as a tech lead I have a lot more random stuff (and meetings) to deal with. I’ve been able to vibe code some non-production stuff like scripts to unify feature lists across JIRA, specs and the upstream docs which has helped free up time to hand craft more code on production.

I don’t care too much about the quality or maintainability of those scripts as long as they make my life a bit easier. I do care about the maintainability of the production code base.

The last big update to my git workflow was when I discovered --update-refs as it makes maintaining a stack of feature branches much easier. So far I really only have one “main” dev branch and then peel off the sub-branches at they need merging upstream.

However I shall have to investigate how the history commands are exposed in magit. I can see it being useful if you have long held branches that take a while to upstream but are useful to have in your trees.

Just an early example of AI psychosis

In QEMU all of our CI environments are replicable locally as docker/podman images. However usually flaky CI is due to races exposed on overloaded runners so I often also run make -j(nproc) at the same time to simulate that. A retry script is also useful to get an idea of how stable a test is. Having sanitizer builds can also help.

Sony can afford to discount on the promise of online sales and planned cost reduction. I’m not sure Microsoft are going to manage another Xbox.

I mean usually the instructor just gets out the plane while on the ground and tells you to go round again. I’m not sure what was going on with this one but they at least seemed to think their student was ready given the words “you know what to do”.

I suspect it’s profitable in the abstract - and their accountants would be bad at their jobs if they couldn’t work out what utilisation rate you need to pay for the server runtime.

However how aggressively you amortise the cost of the training is the key, especially if you keep releasing new models every 6 months.

Invariably it’s having to scroll that’s the issue and you don’t want to be cross contaminating via your shiny black mirror.

Following recipes. These days I print them out because it’s a pain constantly washing your hands to check the next step on the phone. But I’m not buying smart glasses just that. My normal glasses are expensive enough already.

Is this a sign of Lemmy’s popularity that we are now getting thirst spam?

Lol - predictive text got me. Fixed now.

I suspect they have sorted by the name and displayed a localised version which uses the truncated full version: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

ETA fixed typo

I was bracing for AI slop but was pleasantly surprised to find it is good old fashioned editing.

Because running servers costs money. The project I work on gets donations towards it’s CI costs and it’s not insignificant.

“Just going to pop outside to smoke a removed” would not raise eyebrows in the UK.

I don’t know but i suspect there will be wording in the terms of service against using GitHub to host services.

I personally have email integrated into my editor (mu4e) so I can apply patches and search code directly from the email thread. It handles threads and searching really well.

Issue triage, code exploration, extracting information from disparate sources, first pass code review. There are loads of use cases that it’s potentially useful.

For me it’s a lot better at extracting the requirements for a CPU feature from a 10,000 page architecture reference manual than I am.