deleted by creator

A trial attorney? I could see it she wanted to be like a corporate attorney or real estate or something, where your character as a person isn’t relevant. How is she going to empanel a jury without potential jurors having preexisting feelings about her trustworthiness? “Yeah, she seems sincere, but remember that time on her reality show where she was faking tears for sympathy?”

I don’t know her, or how competent she would be at trial, and anyone can be anything they want to be. But also, recognize that choices have consequences. Maybe trading dignity for fame and fortune means you don’t get to live any dream you like.

That’s one way to look at it. On the other hand, these gravy seals are armed to the teeth and itching to fulfill a lifelong dream to “justifiably” murder somebody. If they can’t manage to arrest someone without their pants falling down, they’re just going to start blasting.

I would just think you’re trying to be funny. If you keep a deadpan face, you might succeed.

deleted by creator

Ok, so the coroner and his brother had a hidden room where they kept decomposing bodies, some as long as 15 years. This was discovered and he resigned his position as coroner. A new coroner was appointed.

That coroner’s office also, separately, planned a community event for a Halloween party. The planned Halloween party would have had zero corpses, and the creep who kept the corpses wasn’t invited to attend (probably?). Cancelling the event had nothing to do with safety, in spite of what the unnecessary quotes in the headline would suggest.

I will say: It is.

She’s never been important enough to be protected by the people who will be named in the Epstein files.

Jobs took credit for everyone else’s work. He presented himself as a visionary and a creator, when he was mostly just a liar and a thief.

Maybe Edison was worse. I’m not saying Jobs was worse than Edison. I’m saying Jobs fabricated a legacy that a lot of people still believe, and will believe for a long time.

Steve Jobs was the Edison of personal computing.

Yes, but will they be able to capture the true narrative complexity of asking a desk toy to provide randomized platitudes and admonisitions? How can they please the built-in hardcore fans without alienating the newcomers who don’t have an encyclopedic understanding of the extensive lore? Will they tackle some of the more problematic canon events that have aged poorly in a more enlightened society? Or will they gloss over those moments and modernize the deep mythology on which the intellectual property is based and risk abandoning the edge that made it popular in the first place?

Concentrate and ask again

Fuck.

Kinda wonder if I’m on it. Like, am I doing enough talking about anti-Christian values and morality?

I mean, it’s still an abuse of power and a violation of the constitution, even if the victim is a piece of shit.

I’m legitimately unconvinced that they got the right guy. There are issues with all of the evidence against him, and I fully believe that the federal government would, in the absence of an actual suspect, frame the first convenient loner. Like there’s probably a list of “questionable” individuals in a file at the FBI that they can pull up when they need a scapegoat. “How about this Luigi guy? He’s in the general vicinity, and he doesn’t have an alibi. Grab the gun and one of those manifestos from the pile, we gotta go pick him up.”

It’s also possible he’s guilty, but the prosecution still has to follow the rule of law. If he cannot get a fair trial, he must go free. That’s the only way we can be certain that the government won’t throw us in prison without a fair trial.

Why would his murderers inspect the crime scene?

For photos and videos, Immich. I don’t really care about backups for contacts, messages, or games, so I just do photos and videos.

Sure, it’s fiction, and Superman’s powers and limitations are whatever the plot demands.

But if he could move that fast, and he was in a real major city with real people and real problems, then he would be saving people nonstop. Because he could. If he’s faster than light, he could go save everyone without anyone noticing he left the room (setting aside physics, of course). But he’d never be able to stop, and he would never run out of people to save.

And none of it would be supervillains and giant robots or space lasers.

But then, applying any sort of real world rationality to Superman never ends well.

He has super hearing and super speed, and can hear everything across the city. In NYC, an approximate analog of Metropolis, there are over 37,000 car accidents with major injuries or fatalities every year. That’s 100 car accidents each day, every day, just car accidents. If he were to actually try to save everyone he could, he would never have any time for anything else, not even sleep. It’s one thing to go take a sudden bathroom break when Lois is dangling from the ledge on the roof of a building. It’s something else to leave the room every 15 minutes of every hour because people can’t stop texting while driving.

What the chicken fried fuck are you talking about?

Fridging is a form of reductionist misogyny. It’s not just that somebody died, it’s that a woman existed only to die in a brutal fashion.

Yeah but that’s because many human cells are really big.