3·
24 days agoI was attempting to add to/build on the joke. Apologies if I came off as doing anything else.
- 1 Post
- 101 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: July 31st, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
An incredibly convenient property of small numbers is that if you add a small number to a very small number, the % increase is orders of magnitude larger than both numbers combined and that looks very impressive when you are pretending to do statistics.
4·1 month agoIt’s “Limited Time”?
The limited-time rebrand to Maxwell Apartment delivers the same delicious taste, aroma, quality and ingredients – in fact it’s all the same except the name. An extension of the brand’s “Good to the Last Drop” platform, Maxwell Apartment is one of two campaigns debuting from the coffee brand this fall as it continues to emphasize its dedication to rich, consistent flavor people can count on while doubling down on offering the best value in coffee.
1·1 month agoThanks. I just tried adjusting a few gamescope settings but the utilization still goes down over time. Seems to give me a virtual sandboxed display? I’m honestly not sure how I can use it to troubleshoot more than I can by adjusting the settings in game. Any recommendations on options that might reveal more information?
Thanks again.
I updated my post with graphs from a DLSS Performance + Low Graphics Preset run. Didn’t seem to have any impact, beyond lower initial GPU Load (low 70’s vs high 90s).
Tried as few things from your suggestion:
- Running vulkaninfo or switching to the desktop have no performance “reset” type effect.
- Prefer Maximum Performance didn’t seem to make a difference.
I might try to run a few other games to see if anything else triggers it. I haven’t noticed any other games with the FPS drop over time but I don’t play many other demanding games.
With my motherboard’s “Expo I” setting (uses timing from RAM rather than system default), I do get occasional core errors in Windows and Linux on hour combined runs, and sometimes just with the CPU/Memory hour run, though its inconsistent - sometimes just one or a few errors, another time a slew of them. I figured my “Expo I” setting might have something to do with it so I turned it off.
With it off I ran it for a full hour, once in Windows and once in Linux, and now receive no errors. Played for about 2 hours tonight on Linux and the issue still occurs without using the “Expo I” setting.
Got about ~110 minutes on Windows 10 tonight. FPS was stable. Graphs posted.
I actually originally started SM2 on Windows 10 last fall playing single player, and I did play a few nights this summer on Windows 10 while troubleshooting to test. I was unable to reproduce the issue on Windows - played 2+ hours without it happening.
I think I did it a few weeks ago actually, when my discord client wouldn’t connect and I figured I’d test it again to see.
If I have time with all my other testing I’ll give it another shot tonight or tomorrow night.
Definitely on Bazzite. I tried lowering the DLSS render scale to performance and also dropping the graphics quality preset.
I’ll double check that it still happens on Tumbleweed though and log it later today.
I don’t click Google Drive links.
Fair enough. I’ve since posted images of several graphs.I initially assumed thermal throttling or resource exhaustion. I just can’t find any evidence to support either cause.
Heat: No temperatures I can measure are anywhere near the limits that cause throttling. GPU, CPU, SSD are all relatively cool. I can’t measure VRAM temp (because NVIDIA) but it’s also important to note zero issues in Windows.
Resources: Neither RAM or VRAM appear to be exhausted. My idle tests show 5.5/16GB VRAM and 16/64GB System RAM used. Other system-wide monitors confirm that VRAM/RAM and GPU/CPU usage (overall) matches the games usage so nothing external seems to be hogging the resources. I have plenty of space left in my partitions so I’m not running out of disk space.
I ran the game for a while, idling. GPU load is down to 70%. I ran the process. Also tried looping nvidia-smi in the background with the game as the focus for a while.
> nvidia-smi -q -l 1 -f smi.log -d PERFORMANCEAll of the records look like this:
> nvidia-smi -q -d PERFORMANCE ==============NVSMI LOG============== Timestamp : Tue Sep 23 07:06:07 2025 Driver Version : 580.82.07 CUDA Version : 13.0 Attached GPUs : 1 GPU 00000000:01:00.0 Performance State : P0 Clocks Event Reasons Idle : Not Active Applications Clocks Setting : Not Active SW Power Cap : Not Active HW Slowdown : Not Active HW Thermal Slowdown : Not Active HW Power Brake Slowdown : Not Active Sync Boost : Not Active SW Thermal Slowdown : Not Active Display Clock Setting : Not Active Clocks Event Reasons Counters SW Power Capping : 1160456 us Sync Boost : 0 us SW Thermal Slowdown : 0 us HW Thermal Slowdown : 0 us HW Power Braking : 0 us Sparse Operation Mode : N/A
Since I’ve been checking, my kernel has been 6.14 to 6.16+, whatever Bazzite and now openSUSE Tumbleweed defaults to. Currently - Kernel Version: 6.16.7-1-default (64-bit). I’m not familiar with the xanmod kernel or running custom kernels at all.
I believe that I’ve ruled that out. See the blue line in the
fourthfifth graph in each set. When idling VRAM is steady at ~5.5GB, but performance degrades. I’ve also checked VRAM availability outside of mangohud while the game is running and my total VRAM usage/availability aligns with the game’s VRAM usage reported by mangohud.
It seems I get stuck once a benchmark is finished. I downloaded what appears to be an appimage from their website. Ex.
00:00:00 - Info - Benchmark schedule started at 2025-09-22 23:46:03 00:00:00 - Info - CPU - Benchmark initializing 00:00:00 - Info - CPU - Benchmark started 00:00:10 - Info - CPU - 1 threads, SSE : 108.47 00:00:10 - Info - CPU - Benchmark stopped 00:00:10 - Info - CPU - Benchmark initializing 00:00:10 - Info - CPU - Benchmark started 00:00:20 - Info - CPU - 16 threads, SSE : 954.19 00:00:20 - Info - CPU - Benchmark stopped 00:00:21 - Info - CPU - Benchmark initializing 00:00:21 - Info - CPU - Benchmark started 00:00:31 - Info - CPU - 1 threads, AVX : 229.73 00:00:31 - Info - CPU - Benchmark stopped 00:00:31 - Info - CPU - Benchmark initializing 00:00:31 - Info - CPU - Benchmark started 00:00:42 - Info - CPU - 16 threads, AVX : 1 935.24 00:00:42 - Info - CPU - Benchmark stopped 00:00:42 - Info - Uploading the results to Ocbase 00:00:42 - Info - Schedule Completed ~~~~~ 00:00:00 - Info - Benchmark schedule started at 2025-09-22 23:52:29 00:00:00 - Info - Memory - Benchmark initializing 00:00:00 - Info - Memory - Benchmark started 00:00:10 - Info - Memory - Read : 2 034.06 00:00:10 - Info - Memory - Benchmark stopped 00:00:10 - Info - Memory - Benchmark initializing 00:00:10 - Info - Memory - Benchmark started 00:00:20 - Info - Memory - Write : 780.88 00:00:20 - Info - Memory - Benchmark stopped 00:00:21 - Info - Memory - Benchmark initializing 00:00:21 - Info - Memory - Benchmark started 00:00:31 - Info - Memory - Combined : 1 317.76 00:00:31 - Info - Memory - Benchmark stopped 00:00:31 - Info - Uploading the results to Ocbase 00:00:31 - Info - Schedule Completed ~~~~~ 00:00:00 - Info - Benchmark schedule started at 2025-09-22 23:56:51 00:00:00 - Info - Storage benchmark - Benchmark initializing 00:00:00 - Info - Storage benchmark - Benchmark started 00:00:21 - Info - Storage benchmark - Sequential Read : 7 360.58 MB/s 00:00:21 - Info - Storage benchmark - Benchmark stopped 00:00:22 - Info - Storage benchmark - Benchmark initializing 00:00:22 - Info - Storage benchmark - Benchmark started 00:00:43 - Info - Storage benchmark - Sequential Write : 6 246.57 MB/s 00:00:43 - Info - Storage benchmark - Benchmark stopped 00:00:44 - Info - Storage benchmark - Benchmark initializing 00:00:44 - Info - Storage benchmark - Benchmark started 00:01:06 - Info - Storage benchmark - Random Read : 1 651.07 MB/s 00:01:06 - Info - Storage benchmark - Benchmark stopped 00:01:07 - Info - Storage benchmark - Benchmark initializing 00:01:07 - Info - Storage benchmark - Benchmark started 00:01:28 - Info - Storage benchmark - Random Write : 1 870.32 MB/s 00:01:28 - Info - Storage benchmark - Benchmark stopped 00:01:29 - Info - Schedule Completed 00:01:29 - Info - Uploading the results to OcbaseAfter the CPU, Memory, and Storage benchmarks it consistently just… sits. No errors, nothing of note. I have a big stop button and the green animation continues at the top left. However nothing else happens after this point if I wait/leave it for a while. The “Stop” button is unresponsive. I have to close and reopen. Am I doing something wrong? I tried Memory and CPU multiple times, same behavior. Tried the “Test” version 15, same.
I did have some success with the latency test. Only tried it once though.
00:00:00 - Info - Benchmark schedule started at 2025-09-22 23:54:02 00:00:00 - Info - Latency / bandwidth - Benchmark initializing 00:00:00 - Info - Latency / bandwidth - Pausing monitoring to ensure accurate readings through the benchmark 00:00:00 - Info - Latency / bandwidth - Benchmark started 00:00:03 - Info - Latency / bandwidth - L1 Latency : 2.89 ns 00:00:10 - Info - Latency / bandwidth - L1 Read Bandwidth : 2 557.30 GiB/s 00:00:17 - Info - Latency / bandwidth - L1 Write Bandwidth : 2 550.08 GiB/s 00:00:20 - Info - Latency / bandwidth - L2 Latency : 6.72 ns 00:00:27 - Info - Latency / bandwidth - L2 Read Bandwidth : 1 785.33 GiB/s 00:00:34 - Info - Latency / bandwidth - L2 Write Bandwidth : 1 745.18 GiB/s 00:00:40 - Info - Latency / bandwidth - L3 Latency : 51.07 ns 00:00:46 - Info - Latency / bandwidth - L3 Read Bandwidth : 593.72 GiB/s 00:00:53 - Info - Latency / bandwidth - L3 Write Bandwidth : 356.05 GiB/s 00:01:01 - Info - Latency / bandwidth - Memory Latency : 73.82 ns 00:01:13 - Info - Latency / bandwidth - Memory Read Bandwidth : 82.86 GiB/s 00:01:24 - Info - Latency / bandwidth - Memory Write Bandwidth : 30.44 GiB/s 00:01:24 - Info - Latency / bandwidth - Benchmark stopped 00:01:24 - Info - Latency / bandwidth - Resuming Monitoring 00:01:24 - Info - Uploading the results to Ocbase 00:01:24 - Info - Schedule Completed 00:01:24 - Info - Upload successfulRunning the stability now and going to sleep.
I’m in IT and I was a computer Tech. I enjoy building gaming PCs and I know a good bit but this is really frustrating me. As I said, I’m currently driven by spite and hatred of Windows, especially 11.
I’ll play a bit and keep an eye on my SSD temp and I’ll run OCCT later. Thanks!
Mission Control? Do you mean Mission Center?
Sorry, wasn’t sure which SSD I had the Windows Partition on and needed to look up commands to check. Looks like I’m using the newer Sandisk WD Black SN850X for Linux.
I’m with you. It’s so goddamn hard not to be black pilled these days. Everyone is either greedy and looking to take you for all you are worth, a misogynist, a rapist, a fascist, or some combination of all 4 and some other horrible 5th and 6th thing that I can’t think of right now. Lies and disinformation are so prevalent and there are so few consequences that it feels like nothing is what it seems.
If you care about some random issue “A”, there is an entire industry ready to take your money in exchange for the lie that your contribution or patronage is helping “A” when it’s just lining someone’s pockets.
Want to make sure you can buy a thing that isn’t made with child slave labor? I hope you did your research because of the 8 companies “certified” as child-slave-labor free, 3 still use child-slave-labor and just paid for certification, 3 use a supplier that uses it, 1 only uses it part time, and one is legitimately what it claims to be… oh no, wait, they were just bought out by a pro-child-slave-labor corp… I hate everything.