u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)

I like computers, trains, space, radio-related everything and a bunch of other tech related stuff. User of GNU+Linux.
I am also dumb and worthless.
My laptop is ThinkPad L390y running Arch.
I own RTL-SDRv3 and RSP1 clone.

SDF Unix shell username: user224

  • 45 Posts
  • 1.38K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle
  • please take a look and tell me what you think

    Sorry if it seems like I do, but I in fact do not have a brain.
    I just found this tool gets the job done, and that’s it.

    I typically just use it in a pretty stupid manual way.

    local$ waypipe -c zstd=6 ssh username@IP
    remote$ export DISPLAY=:90
    remote$ ./xwayland-satellite :90 &
    remote$ xfce4-panel
    

    Even the xfce4-panel discovery was an accident.
    I was using waypipe before knowing about xwayland-satellite. I wanted to run an X program, so in the same shell I typed vncserver to, well, launch a VNC server. That invoked xfce4-session, BUT since the WAYLAND_DISPLAY was set, XFCE DE attached to waypipe rather than XTigerVNC, launching a full remote desktop over my local one.
    And out of that, xfce4-panel proves pretty useful. I can easily launch other programs using GUI, and also see widgets on that panel.

    Here’s what I mean, if that sounds confusing:

    Plasma panel (bottom) is local, XFCE panel (top and middle bottom) are remote.
    Right, and you’re probably wondering why that app launcher at the top looks shattered. Well, both can’t be opened at once. If the application launcher goes out of focus, it closes.
    But also, I use the shatter effect in KDE Plasma, so it doesn’t go away immediately. This is just as close as I could get with screenshot timing.








  • We have that available, I just use mobile data because I disagree with their ToS.
    The ToS is so restrictive that you basically immediately break it after connecting a device. I was told that, of course, they don’t really care.
    Except - there is a point stating the provider has the right to access your computer if there is a suspicion of ToS violation. Considering the network here is a student-run organization, that could easily be exploited if you piss off someone.
    Maybe I am just paranoid, but no thanks.

    Otherwise, from talking with them, most dorms have 1Gbit, some have 2.5Gbit, and all share a 40Gbit link which could apparently do 100Gbit (I think), but it’s capped due to licensing.
    They leverage national academic network.
    Oh, and they also got a class B subnet back when everyone was sure there’s just way too many IPv4s, so NAT isn’t being used here.









  • Problem with plain Wireguard is if you can’t open ports on some devices to get a direct connection. It should be just fine with hub and spoke model, but NAT Traversal of Tailscale makes a huge difference. I can get a direct connection between 2 devices connected to mobile data and behind CG-NAT.
    And also the config management if you have too many devices.

    Hub and spoke, you just add new devices to Wireguard on the main device, and the new peer. Full mesh, oof.

    But as far as configuring Wireguard goes, that’s pretty simple. And then there’s the weird stuff with MTU and fragmentation… but that’s not something Wireguard-specific.