Every application is a file browser when you open/save, what’s your point?

Really? Why? Anything they might share would be shared with any codebase for a window application right?

Msys2 can be used for that btw

Their training data is their secret

OpenAI doesn’t attribute the original training data, so not consented?

From a user interface perspective, I think it’s far less likely people will report spam than downvote when they do not like something. I suppose we both are only hypothesising here though.

I don’t see offsetting as a good feature. It just seems to drive people into tribalistic up/down wars. What’s the point of users seeing the net votes?

I suppose it makes sense if the change is lemmy-wide

I think it’s better to have a button to report spam, harassment, etc , rather than using downvote. Downvote is too ambiguous.

Yep, they are not portable, every app should come bundled with its own interpreter. As to why, I think historically it didn’t target production grade application development.

Maybe they didn’t want to tarnish the copilot brand with risky privacy invasion

🤩

More than enough for MX Linux with Xfce. But it’s not going to make your applications a whole lot faster.

Why would that be possible? Wouldn’t the developer have their server rejected any calls from “unsigned” apps?

Did those using tutor AI spend less time on learning? That would have been worth measuring

This is probably makes a good case for open sourcing all governing algorithms

Very true because the relationship they have with laptop manufacturers will ensure windows domination

You’re right, there’s no point in general public following these news. When a lab publishes such, it’s meant for other researchers. The other researchers can try to build upon. It might become useful or as an inventor put it - discover a thousand ways of how not to do it.

When you see big numbers reported but see the deployed improvements in single digits, that’s coz the big number improvement gets deployed many years later.

Any way to read the paper published without subscribing to nature?

I borrowed it from an acquaintance on Internet :D

They used pressurised water reactors with enriched uranium. Dunno how the costs run but there is no strategic alternative anyway. They also wouldn’t want such highly enriched uranium to be commonplace.