Errar es humano. Propagar errores automáticamente es #devops

https://vsis.online/

  • 7 Posts
  • 111 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle




  • vsis@feddit.cltolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldIT Department's Plan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    target the largest market segment to gain the most conversions.

    Windows market share is bigger in desktop only. In fact, is kinda sad that still there are serious institutions using Windows for non-desktop stuff. I hope this incident changes it.

    the real difference is you need a few decades of linux experience to fix anything in a timely manner.

    [ citation needed ] Probably you are meaning desktop again. Although troubleshooting Windows is not easy task neither, there are way more desktop users familiar with it.

    The real thing is

      1. There is no single “linux” OS. There are lots of different OSes based on Linux kernel. And they are for servers, desktop, embedded systems, smartphones, etc.
      1. More important. Security is a process, not a product from a vendor. The root cause of this incident is that some institutions are seeing that you just buy “security”, install it, and call it a day. No important stuff should auto-update. And no institution should auto-update lots of important stuff at the same time.

    So, Linux is not really more secure. But is built in a culture where security is taken more seriously.
















  • Nobody likes Adobe, nobody wants to work with Adobe. Nobody can avoid Photoshop. That’s just the world we live in and I don’t like it.

    This sounds like Stockholm syndrome. You are just too familiar with Photoshop, so using anything else is hard and less efficient.

    In photography there is this mantra about “the most important part is right behind the camera”. A good photographer is not a good Nikon user, or good Canon user. A good photographer can deliver decent pictures with a potato camera if needed.

    Sure, a potato camera is less efficient for any work that an actual good one. So it’s good to invest in a good brand. But the point is: if you are not capable to make average results with a potato software, the problem is not in the software.