There’d be motherfuckers on TikTok snorting lines of asbestos

I whole heartedly disagree.

The entire season was laid out the same way they do comic book runs. There was a series of shorter story arcs which each bled one into the next and all fed into a single overarching arc that lasted through the whole season.

The 1st episode was a bridge between the Netflix series and Reborn while setting up the overall season arc.

Episodes 2-3 were the trial of White Tiger while establishing both Muse and the context for the ATVF.

Episode 4 was a bridge between the White Tiger arc and the Muse arc while furthering the ATVF story.

Episode 5 was a bottle episode, but did a LOT of world-building and is probably the single most comic booky episode of television Marvel has ever produced.

Episodes 6-7 was the Muse arc which also fully established the ATVF.

Episodes 8-9 was the culmination of the season-long arc and bringing Bullseye back into the story.

Even the season ending on a new paradigm (Fisk’s martial law and beginning the full-on war between Daredevil and Fisk) is such a comic book move.

I know they came in and had to rework the original plan for the series, but I think they did an excellent job. The only thing I’d have changed is to have more Karen and Frank.

That’s a sign to me that this is a fairly full continuation of the prior Daredevil series

We didn’t need to wait for the finale to get that. It was clear from the opening of episode 1.

Excellent, Excellent season. I really have no serious complaints about anything beyond that I wanted more Frank.

I can’t wait for the Punisher Special Presentation next year. I’m hoping it’s a direct continuation from the credit scene here. A whole show of Frank hunting down and killing fascist cops would be chef’s kiss.

That’s a different situation considering the Irish language was created before there even was a united Ireland. We can trace the history of how English came to America, and it came from the English people. We can’t trace the history of how the Irish language spread across Ireland because it predates history.

Like I said, while semantically imprecise, yes, we did get the English language from the English.

That’s just semantics. Sure, I guess the more proper way to say it is that when the Americans founded the US they continued the practice of race-based chattel slavery which the British had instituted in the colonies prior to the formation of the US. Is that really substantively different than saying the Americans adopted slavery from the British?

Sort of to both, but not really.

Slavery has existed for at least as long as states and kingdoms have, yes. But the specific form slavery took in the Americas (not just the US and North America) was unique. That being race-based chattel slavery. That form had not existed anywhere else in the world previously or since. The closest you could claim were the Helots in ancient Sparta, but even that was closer to serfdom than chattel slavery.

So, no, the British did not “invent slavery”, but they (along with the Spanish and French) did pioneer a new form of slavery that was uniquely brutal and inhumane.

And while you’re correct that America as a nation did not adopt slavery from the British after the formation of the US since the colonials had already been practicing race-based chattel slavery before the US existed. But where did those colonials get that slavery? From the British who were their overlords and ancestors, who formed the colonies, and who created the economic system that relied on race-based chattel slavery.

So while you might be technically right, it’s only due to semantics. The Brits absolutely did create virtually everything about the American system of slavery, which we then continued to perpetrate for another ~century after independence.