It’s started something on a terminal. It is assuming it’s vim, but it’s not operating like vim. I’m questioning it’s assumption. If it had fired up nano, for example, sending vim key sequences isn’t going to work. Seeing as it seems to be doing stuff with git too, it may not have started this editor explicitly. It will be using whatever git is configured to use.

Fortunately it doesn’t contain RAM or flash storage or a GPU, so you may not need to go to humiliation levels of money.

I think it might not be vim.

The Eagles called it Hotel California.

Which aren’t a thing.

Two step siblings have no legal relation as far as I’m aware. It’s just two people who’s parents have married. There’s nothing stopping them having their own relationship.

If you’re concerned about non consensual events, that’s just plain old sexual abuse and rape. That’s completely different.

It cheap to make. The “story” is simple but explains why these two people live in the same house without it being incest.

fictional scenarios of incest relations

Not incest. Step relations are not blood relations. The parents marry and combine their existing families.

I think I would question the reverse. I don’t think I could get my work done if I had to use something else. Maybe MacOS would work…maybe.

I’m always getting powers of ten wrong.

Regardless 500 workers Vs one CFO?

That would include the CFO too, right?

Alternative viewpoint. You could have retained 5,000 employees.

Can somebody explain peertube for me? It sounds like it should be a federated video service, but either the federation doesn’t work very well or there’s nothing on it.

3yo cars are pretty much always less than half. ICE or EV

Slow is smooth. Smooth is fast.

First thing you need to know. There’s nothing special about at Linux x.0 release. It’s just the next one.

It’s the beginning of reality biting for sure.

I think the big one will be when companies like openAI and anthropic have to file audited books in order to IPO (which they both want to do).

The fallback argument for the social media ban is that it’s better than nothing. But with results like these, it may be worse than nothing, given it potentially creates new problems. Children will remain online with arguably less supervision and support, new privacy and digital security vulnerabilities seem to have appeared and the worst aspects of social media lay largely unaddressed.

I wish more people understood this. Changing something can mean you’ve caused harm unintentionally, even if you haven’t identified it yet. Too many people seem to have the thought process “We have to do something! This is something. Let’s do this.” without ever considering the harm they might do.

WHAAAAT?!?! Educating people is better than telling them what to do?

Yes, and this is why old school liberals (i.e. supporters of liberty for all) support social programs. Supporting those that can’t comfortably support themselves brings freedom from exploitation.

…but who taught her to flop off the couch? That sounds like an aunt or uncle.