• seananigans@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yesn’t?

      It kinda improved but it’s also Star Trek discovery still so your mileage will depend on how you feel about that.

      • Steve Sparrow@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        but it’s also Star Trek discovery

        This is important; there’s a distinct feel to the narrative, cinematography, performances and dialogue that the other series def don’t have and kinda maintains through all four (soon to be five) seasons.

      • z3n0x@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Loved the show in season 1-2 but it has been such a camp-fest since s3 I stopped following …

    • fades@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      My exact question. I saw season 1 when it aired but life happened and I never came back to watch the other seasons. Tbh i thought it was over at this point.

      Anyone wanna give me the motivation to binge the next four seasons? Did the show mature?

      • stevecrox@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It never quite finds its grove.

        Season 1, 2 & 3 all had fantastic premises I would have loved 7 seasons of but were all unrelated and concluded within a season.

        Season 4 actually demonstrates the missed opportunity, they deal with the fall out of season 3

        For example if you think of the scene set in “A Vulkan Hello”, you would have ended up with an Action focussed version of DS9.

        You didn’t need a spore drive, Jason Isaacs could have stayed the same and we could still have watched scientists struggle to become soliders with the war causing the type of fall out we see in Season 4.