yes i did a os one but i am wondering what distros do you guys use and why,for me cachyos its fast,flexible,has aur(I loved how easy installing apps was) without tinkering.

  • jimitsoni18@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 minutes ago

    Void because I don’t like gnome, primarily because it uses more than 50% of my resources, so I need something lightweight and have had bad experience with arch. I’ve had some hiccups with void but it wasn’t something I couldn’t fix. The downside is that it there are no package repository mirrors in my region, and sometimes I have to change mirrors to install packages, and some applications are not packages for void, so I have to look for open source alternatives that I have to compile.

  • theRealBassist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    25 minutes ago

    I use TuxedoOS. I wanted something that kept up with the latest KDE updates which ran a cleaned up version of Ubuntu… that’s TuxedoOS to a T. I had looked at other options like Kubuntu or just installing KDE over something like PopOS, but TuxedoOS was the most stable and up to date of those options in my testing.

    That said, I have run into innumerable problems on it due to apt repos that it doesn’t include which come standard on Ubuntu.

  • woodgen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    Arch.

    Because of pacman. Building and writing packages is simple and dependencies are slim. Also packages are recent. And most likely “there is an AUR package for that”. Also stack transitions arrive early, like pipewire.

    Also let’s not forget Arch Wiki, i bet you have read it as a non Arch user.

    I administer Arch on 8 machines including gaming rigs, home server, web server, kids laptop, wifes gaming desktop, audio workstation and machine learning rig and a bunch of dev laptops. I also use ArchARM on RPi for some home automation.

    Never considered switching since I switched from Ubuntu over 15 years ago.

    I do have experience with several other rpm and apt based distros.

  • ElectronBadger@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    27 minutes ago

    Debian Testing (laptop, workstation and RPIs) since it works best for me. Tried Gentoo, Arch, OpenSUSE and several others. Also, I’ve been using FreeBSD for some time.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I’ve been using Bazzite for a few months now (switched from EndeavourOS, which was great) and it’s been amazing. I’m sold on atomic/immutable. I have never had a PC this stable, including every Windows PC I’ve had.

    And it’s perfect for gaming. There are weird little tweaks and settings that I had to do on EOS to get my GPU working correctly, etc., and they all just work out of the box in Bazzite (I did get the iso image made specifically for my laptop, which definitely helps). It’s super impressive actually.

    And distrobox (BoxBuddy comes installed) can be used to access the AUR or whatever if I feel the need to. Just fire up an Arch box, and have at it.

  • Veraxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Arch. I need the AUR for certain applications, and the high degree of customizability and opportunity for learning appeal to me as a relatively new-ish Linux user (going on a few years now, most of that time having been on Arch).

  • IAmHeroForFun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    btw i use Arch, i use it because i found lot less effort it takes to do anything and it’s stable, i do think there is some bug with QTcreator, gotta see it’s os issue or QT issue.

  • callyral [he/they]@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I use NixOS for my desktop because I hate myself you can configure everything without needing to edit a bunch of different config files that use different configuration languages.

    I use Arch btw for my Minecraft server because I am crazy.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I loved EndeavourOS, but I’m just not sure bleeding edge is for me. Mostly because I will forget to update for a week, and suddenly there are 500 updates, all with interconnected dependencies and pacman is just like “wtf dude?”

      I’m not sure I really gained any benefit from that over using a more stable release. I switched to Bazzite a few months back, and it’s been amazing. Immutable is very interesting, and it’s made for the most stable PC I’ve ever owned.

      Highly recommend Bazzite for gamers (or I guess it’s good for multimedia too), or if not, one of the other Fedora-based immutable distros.

      • MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        57 minutes ago

        The only time I come close to that number of updates (300 - 350) is when KDE Applications and KDE is updated at the same time. I update twice a week.

  • Ebahn13@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I use Bazzite so that it matches with my Steam Deck since SteamOS still isn’t an actual distro to play with yet…

  • chrand@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Fedora with GNOME.

    I’ve been using it for over than 10 years in my main computer.

    It simply works, it’s nice, fresh packages, stable, GNOME is productivity champion (at least I know all the shortcuts, and how to tweak it to my daily use). I also know how to build and manipulate RPM packages, so it’s pretty convenient.

    • Lautaro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      37 minutes ago

      I’ve been using Fedora for the last 5 years and never had to reinstall the OS. I’ve been upgrading with no issues whatsoever.

      With Ubuntu, I had to reinstall everything on every update because of errors. Not on EVERY update of course, but often enough to make me want to stick to LTSs.

    • fxdave@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      afaik, fedora is the testing distro for RHEL. I also felt this way, when a new gnome version released much earlier than for Arch and it had an obvious bug that could be catched with little testing.

      And many issues I found in Fedora’s bug tracker was auto closed by the new release. Which is quite frequent. Reviewing the bugs is not that frequent.

      • chrand@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Mostly for fun/learning and to tweak some Fedora packages to my needs. I keep my own RPM repository.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Mint for my desktop system. It just does exactly what I want it to, has good compatibility with software and Cinnamon is my DE of choice.

    NixOS for my server, because being able to use one config repo and format for everything is so nice.

  • Anarchistcowboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I use Debian on my server and Arch on my gaming PC and laptop. Both distros offer minimal installs so I can just add the packages I need and avoid the ones I don’t. Debian offers a nice stable base for running my services with minimal downtime and Arch has the most up to date packages for all the cutting edge features I want on desktop.