• Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      12 days ago

      Tell that to the social Democrats that build labor rights brick by brick a century ago. A lot of times they litterally starved on strike.

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 days ago

        You’re right. But they would have literally starved or been mangled by a machine if they had done nothing. Back then, the greatest weapons the top 1% had were hired guns.

        A century ago, your choices were to die today on strike, or die tomorrow from starvation or work conditions, even if you play by the rules. Now, the greatest weapon the 1% has is complacency. You can die today on strike or you can play by the rules and the corporate overlords will feed you just enough until you become too expensive to feed.

        How do you ask someone to starve when they have a legitimate alternative? Complacency is a killer.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          How do you ask someone to starve when they have a legitimate alternative?

          I know this was more of a rhetorical question, but for anyone who is legitimately asking this question: you show them that it’s not actually a binary choice. There’s options like communism and unionization that can both protect them and feed them.

          • thefartographer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 days ago

            The best part of long-term solutions is that they’re actually solutions. The worst part about immediate satisfaction is that it’s only immediately satisfying. If someone has an immediate problem, it’s hard to get them to look at long-term solutions.

            Sorry, I’ve been a major downer today…

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      in practice it do seem like that…

      But the Adjuster was from well off family, and not all of us dirt poor… i don’t blame the snitch here.

      I do expect most people to be able to do their part tho… if wage slaves can’t rally around this, we gonna have another generation of the fuckening.

      make no mistake, the owner class will punish us hard for this.

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        I don’t blame the worker either. I don’t know their story, but if someone told me that I could either keep my mouth shut or feed and care for my family, I’d probably get chatty too. $60K isn’t enough to feed you for life, but it’s enough to get reliable transportation, clear a little debt, and buy a little time and cloth to interview for a job that pays better than McDonald’s.

        What I’m saying is that it’s really hard to live by high standards when getting fired from your shitty-ass job could destroy, yet it doesn’t pay enough for you to escape. Once again, class solidarity is for those who can afford it.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          Once again, class solidarity is for those who can afford it.

          Ok, where are you going with this?

          middle 60% of america can’t afford to not be a bootlicker?

          • thefartographer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            12 days ago

            The middle class income ranges from $17k per person up to $90k per person. I hope you don’t think that I’m trying to belittle anyone. Someone making 90K can definitely afford to not be a bootlicker; a family of four averaging nearly $17K per family member is gonna have a much harder time.

            The year that I lost my shit-paying job only to find an even worse-paying job with more hours was really fucking tough. If you’d offered me $60K legally when I was making $12K and scrambling for rent, I’d’ve had a really hard fucking time saying no to that. Back then, I was living alone and had very little to live for. Drop me into my current living arrangement and sub that situation: I’m saying yes to the money 80% of the time.

            I wish I could say that I’m better than that, but struggling in a capitalist society makes you sick, scared, and desperate really fast. I’m not saying that people with lower income deserve lower expectations or should live by lower standards. I’m just saying to reserve your judgement before shitting on someone and labeling them a snitch before you know whether they could have afforded anything else.

            For those of us who can afford class solidarity against the top 1%, we need to remember that the most vulnerable need to be helped up, not stepped on. Instinctually blaming this McDonald’s worker helps the billionaires class far more than many of us may realize.

            Maybe I’m off-base, but ultimately, this act of betrayal is unlikely to have an effect on the momentum of this potential movement. Whoever killed Thompson is unlikely to act again, their message was unlikely to be heard while they were in hiding, and if they are the hero everyone believes they also likely would forgive someone who was trying to de-shittify their life a little bit.

            If you want this to move forward, pull those below you up so they can join us, not attack them for being on a lower level. Class solidarity is for those who can afford it. It sounds like you and I can afford it, so help someone else be able to afford it. Don’t shun people who are too scared of starving to fight. Feed them.