I’m one of the few volunteer contributors to Bonfire, and I would never dream of recommending Mozilla to use it. You have to reach out to people where they are at, not pick the tools based on prime principles. American platforms are blackmailing us by gatekeeping access to audiences, but it’s not like you can pretend most humans are reachable on microscopic federated platforms. Which btw is not the intended use case for bonfire.
It’s fun how every country reinvents the newspaper-selling machine. It’s like carcinization, but for politics.
bro, the people who identify as right-wing in the USA control the state, the farms, the businesse, the technology, and they are a considerable part of the working class.
Who do you think Lenin was trying to win over with all his activities? People who already identified as socialist? Obviously winning over people who identify as right-wing is necessary, especially if your idea of right wing is anybody who is not actively building a socialist revolution.
yeah, I conveyed a similar feedback to the author of the article. Thanks for the analysis
what’s wrong with the title?
I don’t understand your downvotes. If they are from scabs, or they are from people who only read the title and thought this is some managerial shit.
because I joined a long time ago?
ok, scab
We have plenty of text-based community platforms, depending on the country you’re in. It’s all stuff that will be presented at the call.
We are throughout USA and Europe. I can give you personal advice as someone who emigrated, and you might want to ask the question in the community chats of different chapters, but TWC is for collective action, not for individual career support
Because the infrastructure group is concerned with more critical work around self-hosting than video calls. If you want to sponsor a jitsi server and do the plumbing work of replacing all our technical and organizational dependencies on zoom with Jit.si, feel free to join and expand our self-hosted infrastructure.
we have our own self-hosted infrastructure for critical data. We use Zoom just to passively filter FOSS purists and hackerinos. (jk, not true, we do it because the infrastructure group prioritized other things, but it works anyway)
we don’t take dues and we are not an union in a legal sense. Requirements: time, energy, and motivation to learn and contribute. You’re going to get trained on things once you join.
Join our community space before the 101 if you like: https://techworkerscoalition.org/subscribe/
If you build the infrastructure for a certain thing to happen, you’re responsible for the thing. For the same reason we hold facebook accountable for the rise of the far-right, we should hold WikiPedia accountable for this stuff. Infrastructure is never neutral.
yeah, it’s quite big, because in a way it’s the biggest win so far for the BDS in American tech.
I unionize people in the tech sector. Childish nerds are much harder to work with than anybody else.
I would pick a coked out analyst over an emacs user every day
nerds are often egotistical, selfish and individualistic. Let’s kick them out and unionize instead
I wrote about this topic too, if you’re interested: https://write.as/conjure-utopia/the-verbose-story-of-how-i-left-the-tech-industry-and-started-washing-miso-jars
So the author’s argument is that youth have just gone to gig work instead of traditional jobs. OK, maybe true, but first of all, this is not a good thing on its own either. And secondly, we have to consider why gig work even exists, aside from being a fresh new way to exploit workers and deny them the traditional protections of the labor market. Because there is a specific reason gig work exists right at this very transitional moment in the workforce, and I’ll give you a spoiler: It exists because of AI.
Considering the author is possibly the most relevant scholar on (against?) platform work, I’m quite sure he would agree with you. The article implies that AI is deskilling and displacing workers and that’s intrinsically a bad thing.
A lot of these spaces are reading, writing and designing around so-called “anti-capture” protocols exactly to avoid that.