• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 days ago

    No one can bank online without reliable encryption. No one can transact business online without reliable encryption.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 day ago

        Instead you just have to trust that anything you’re doing is actually with who they claim to be. No encryption means no identity or security guarantee.

              • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                This specific thread is talking about transacting business and banking online. You should be more careful to keep your arguments separated. Otherwise you not only look like an idiot but you also prove you can’t multitask for shit.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        In which case anyone who wants to can read the message traffic and make changes to it before passing it on to the receiver.

        No, you can’t conduct business this way.

        • annette_runner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Thats why it would have to be a closed system with controlled transmissions rather than omnidirectional radio transmissions.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            24 hours ago

            You mean, for everyone to have their own infrastructure, many times what we have now, and still some jerk can literally wiretap like in old times?

            Or send messengers?