Here’s a puzzle: How do you write a law that’s so badly designed that (1) the people it’s meant to help oppose it, (2) the people who hate regulation support it, and (3) everyone …
So how would this work with the fediverse? Like we federate all content…its going to be VERY difficult to do anything if political content creators keep being told to take it down.
No, it’s worse than that. It’s impossible to meet the standards set in this and other bills of it’s type without having a shortlist of curated, controlled people creating online content. That’s literally the point, keeping people from interesting with information they deem unsavory.
That said, it is impossible to enforce unless they want to set up the great firewall of america.
So how would this work with the fediverse? Like we federate all content…its going to be VERY difficult to do anything if political content creators keep being told to take it down.
It doesnt work. Literally unenforceable outside of traditional walled gardens.
Wow. If the fediverse is only operable by meta’s instance inside the USA, I’m really going to miss everyone, because I’m just not, with meta.
No, it’s worse than that. It’s impossible to meet the standards set in this and other bills of it’s type without having a shortlist of curated, controlled people creating online content. That’s literally the point, keeping people from interesting with information they deem unsavory.
That said, it is impossible to enforce unless they want to set up the great firewall of america.
basically only Right wing propaganda is allowed.
so we create a walled garden of our own.
can’t complain if the public can’t view it.
someone takes screenshots of the problematic content and shares it? well they’re in trouble for posting/sharing problematic content.
such as reddit, we already know they have been doing it at the behest of the gop since '16