Absolutely needed: to get high efficiency for this beast … as it gets better, we’ll become too dependent.

“all of this growth is for a new technology that’s still finding its footing, and in many applications—education, medical advice, legal analysis—might be the wrong tool for the job,”

  • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    In what area of AI? Image generation is increasing in leaps and bounds. Video generation even more so. Image reconstruction for games (DLSS, XeSS, FSR) is having generational improvements almost every year. AI chatbots are getting much much smarter seemingly every month.

    What’s one main application of AI that hasn’t improved?

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Which chatbots are getting smarter?

      I know AI has potential, but specifically LLMs (which most people mean when talking about AI) seem to have hit their technological limits.

        • msage@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Smarter how? Synthetic benchmarks?

          Because I’ve heard the opposite from users and bloggers.

          • Terrasque@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Yes, which has improved some tasks measurably. ~20% improvement on programming tasks, as a practical example. It has also improved tool use and agentic tasks, allowing the llm to plan ahead and adjust it’s initial approach based on later parts.

            Having the llm talk through the tasks allows it to improve or fix bad decisions taken early based on new realizations on later stages. Sort of like when a human thinks through how to do something.

            • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              For example? Citations?

              Pretty sure these “tasks” are meaningless metrics made up by pseudo-scientific grifters.

              • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Small bits of code, language related tasks, basic context understanding, not metrics I have literally measured simply noticed has improved compared to non reasoning models in my homelab testing. 🤷‍♂️

              • IsaamoonKHGDT_6143@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                AlphaFold 3 which can help in the prediction of some proteins. Although it has some limitations, it cannot be used in all cases, only in what it can perform without any problem.

    • Almacca@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      They’ve been a boon for medical diagnoses as well, I believe.

      Has anyone made AI powered accounting software yet? I’d love to tell my computer ‘Here’s all my financial information in a big heap. Do my taxes.’ The numbers and tax laws are all known things. It shouldn’t be hard.

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        Any strictly rule-based system, like accounting and taxes, is a job for traditional software, not AI. Particularly when the laws change every year.

        • Almacca@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Once it has the information in a recognisable format. Reading and recognising random receipts, bank statements, payment slips, and whatever and sorting it into a coherent format is what I’m trying to avoid.

          • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I see. So AI for gathering the information to put into the accounting/tax software?

            That’s a more reasonable ask, but I wouldn’t personally trust AI with that. I’ve done something similar in games where I take a picture of something on screen and ask AI to collect all the information from many similar pictures into a table. It’s definitely good enough for gaming, but it makes mistakes often enough I wouldn’t sign my name attesting to the truth of anything it produced, you know?

            • Almacca@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Fair point, but i feel like that’s something that’s technologically solvable, and this is dealing only with text, a lot of which is already digital, just in multiple formats, and all easily checkable against the final figures if anyone so desires.

              As a random aside, I saw a clip recently where someone had asked an ‘AI’ model to reproduce a photo with zero changes one hundred times. There were more than zero changes.

              • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Surprisingly, the mistakes ChatGPT made weren’t related to picture processing. Every time I’ve sent a picture, it has flawlessly analyzed the text (even if it’s a screenshot of a massive Linux log or a screenshot with multiple windows / arbitrary text placement). The problems were more like the markdown table I created would not be reproduced perfectly with the new changes/additions. It’s pretty reliable early on, but either as the chat gets longer or the table does, fidelity can be lost. Not very often, but it does happen.

                Just to clarify. But I find as long as you’re paying close attention and can catch mistakes or verify the output, AI does make such tasks much less tedious.