If it’s justified for an imperiled person to use potentially-lethal force against an attacker at a particular moment in time in defense of self, it is justifiable for anyone to use that same level of force against that same attacker at that same moment in time in defense of that imperiled person.
If the killer’s actions were justifiable homicide, the “bank [doing] the same thing” would also be justifiable homicide.
because murder is typically frowned upon.
It’s not murder, it’s justifiable homicide.
if a bank did the same thing it would definitively be murder.
And the military?
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/harry-patch-quotes-last-ww1-soldier-veteran-story-a3986781.html
keep on forgetting that there are still the weirdos that respect the military(s)
If it’s justified for an imperiled person to use potentially-lethal force against an attacker at a particular moment in time in defense of self, it is justifiable for anyone to use that same level of force against that same attacker at that same moment in time in defense of that imperiled person.
If the killer’s actions were justifiable homicide, the “bank [doing] the same thing” would also be justifiable homicide.
You are a straight shooter. I feel the just logical stoicism flowing through your simple statement. Hahaha
Found the vegan.
Nah, all the vegans I know are super chill about murder if the dead person ate meat.
True, but they also think it is “murder” when I eat my dino nuggies. They clearly don’t know what “murder” actually is.
This was suicide. “Being a CEO” in 2025 is suicidal ideation.