Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-29 天前It's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.message-squaremessage-square161fedilinkarrow-up1628arrow-down152
arrow-up1576arrow-down1message-squareIt's interesting that gun rights were sold on the basis of "resisting unlawful government." They seen to have caused and supported unlawful government.Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-29 天前message-square161fedilink
minus-squareshplane@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·9 天前Let’s not get tied up in semantics but the idea that you can’t “accidentally” shoot someone is nonsense. Whether you call it negligence or not, if it’s not on purpose, then it’s an accident.
minus-squareArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 天前Accident isn’t a harsh enough word.
minus-squarebreecher@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·8 天前They subscribe to the NRA falsehood about “guns don’t kill people etc.”. Such people are usually lost causes.
Let’s not get tied up in semantics but the idea that you can’t “accidentally” shoot someone is nonsense. Whether you call it negligence or not, if it’s not on purpose, then it’s an accident.
Accident isn’t a harsh enough word.
They subscribe to the NRA falsehood about “guns don’t kill people etc.”. Such people are usually lost causes.