But it won’t include linux drivers

*rimshot*

Is it even really a loanword when it’s just the name of a thing from there? Like, Nyarit isn’t a loan word it’s just the name of a state, right? But then again, I might consider Milwaukee a loanword from Algonquin, idfk. But a crepe is just a french food with a french name, is that really a loanword if it’s a whole loanfood? But then if I say Deutschland instead of Germany I’m just spreche auf deutsch, warum ist es nicht so für “tamales?”

Is there an official ruling on this?

Screens would get in the way of my many magnets with notes. Not only does it not “need” one, I’m actively anti screen in this case.

Can’t forget Guy LeDouche!

You can find videos of archers having fun at a range, why does that not cause school archings? You can find videos of drunk ass axe throwers having fun at axe throwing places, does axe culture inspire school axings? Fun doesn’t cause crime, the crime is caused by deep socioeconomic issues that can’t be solved by stopping fun. And fun != irresponsible without your painting it as “fun causes school shootings” especially when you differentiate it from stupidity yourself.

Your study doesn’t actually account for the fact that most school shooters, being unable to legally purchase firearms, steal them from their parents, and therefore it’s more likely by default that their parents are “gun culture” people by virtue of owning guns. That still doesn’t mean their kids stealing their guns to commit murder is “gun culture.” Causation != correlation and such.

Your second study basically says “the more guns around the higher likelihood someone can steal one.” Sure, but places with more permissive alcohol laws also have more drunk drivers, should we ban alcohol?

If you ever talked to anyone actually “in the gun culture” (a phrase that is still laughable to me as if it were a real thing), you’d learn safety is paramount, that they are not toys. This is what you’re saying is responsible for school shootings because they’re treating them like toys? Sure lol. Another example of the basic safety rules from a guy responsible for school shootings, clearly you can hear him saying “play with them wantonly” right there, huh? How bout this guy? Clearly, “gun culture” doesn’t treat guns as toys. Instigram dumbshits are not “gun culture,” the gentleman responding to them here, well, again gun culture isn’t really a thing like you seem to think but he’s as close as we’ll get just like all the other safety advocates in these links.

You gonna blame KMFDM next, or?

deleted by creator

“Gun culture” and “kids committing crimes” are two separate things. “Gun culture” (if you can even call it that) is IDPA, USPSA, Cowboy Action, skeet (haha), trap, hunting, historical collections, non-historical collections, and defense. Not murdering unarmed kids in a school with a stolen or illegally purchased gun. Incel culture maybe but not “gun culture.”

This is like saying “car culture” is running over grandmas while drunk driving, rather than cosmetic/performance mods, racing, antique car shows full of Chevy Bel-Airs and Novas, muscle cars, etc. It’s not. “Alcoholic culture” maybe but not “car culture.”

Maybe you should take that step back.

Penis Man gets up, doesn’t needlessly cap, hits good spots, afaik hasn’t ratted on any other writers, paints illegally not bullshit legal murals, and isn’t a biter.

Penis Man fucking rules, he’s what all writers should aspire to be.

I am not a fan of initiating violence either generally

Coulda fooled me. Seems to be you’re the one in this convo advocating for it, and as further evidence to that point you’re still literally incapable of even understanding my argument all these comments later despite me literally telling you that my argument is “initiating violence is bad.”

I’m gonna go with “nuh uh” on this one, I straight up do not believe you truthfully aren’t a “fan” of initiating violence after having spent this entire convo advocating and excusing exactly what you claim you’re not a fan of. Something tells me you enjoy it, not sure what, but I think it was you literally saying you enjoy it.

I’m actually an anarchist tyvm

Mmhmm I’ve heard that one before. If true, great.

You were the one who said that you would cut contact or argue;

cut contact or argue

argue

HOLY SHIT WHO PUT THAT THERE?! Oh me. Well good, then I can continue to argue without contradicting myself, phew.

Really thought that was your slam dunk? You’re really bad at this. If you were this SJW admin and we were talking about trans stuff, guess I’d still be arguing with you.

To translate it for you since you seem to be having issues differentiating violence from conversation, I was saying I’m not going to beat this admin up for saying shit I don’t agree with, instead I’ll either cut contact (as in not talk to them, walk away, or here “block”) or (like this) argue. You’ll notice I’m also not beating you up because we disagree on initiating violence. Probably because my whole argument is “that’s bad.”

This fun for you? It is for me lol.

Idek who the admin there is, but I’m also arguing with an .ml tankie, does that mean I’m supporting nutomic because his site is facilitating that? By interacting with the internet at all through companies like cloudflare, whatever device you use, your ISP, does that mean you support capitalism? Maybe you should self isolate from them yourself. By using a Mali TLD does that mean you support everything the Mali gov does including their arbitrary detentions, enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings?

Probably not, you’re probably not dumb enough to actually believe that bullshit argument you put up, you just think I am. Nice try but no dice.

Too bad you can’t resort to violence because this is the internet and you have to use your words, I can see why you’re prone to violence if this is the limit of your argumentative prowess.

But they are denying the current persecution of the uyghurs; denying the various historical atrocities like the holodomor, Tienanmen square, the katyn massacre, etc; excusing the ones they can’t deny; and simping for authoritarianism. Oh and lets not forget a decent contingent of them agree with nutomic that transness is bourgoise.

So what you’re saying is tankies should be violently persecuted for their words with no other provocation by people like me who disagree with them. Lucky for you, were we arguing IRL I wouldn’t get violent until you do, because I’m not a piece of shit. Enjoy it all you like, and I’ll judge you all I like.

Sure, then again tankies suck but I don’t think people should initiate violence against them for their words, I’ll just argue or cut comtact. Guess that’s what makes me better than you.

I’m gonna be honest, kicking the shit out of a nerd because you don’t agree with his words is not as cool as you seem to think.

Sure he was “wrong,” but did anyone try “please leave, we no longer wish to discuss these matters with you” before jumping to initiating violence? Multiple attackers no less (which would meet the threshold of deadly force in most states, luckily for them not Greece).

Back in my day children were taught to use their words, but I guess immature adults that are incapable of doing so still have to bully people physically, sucks to suck I guess, get eloquent losers.

Oh you seemed like you thought it was legal and that we should consider criminalizing it, but you mean we should make it double illegal. Good plan!

Oh well I guess I do that then lol. My technique (which is, I think, normal) is to melt my butter (probably too much) on like 2, really low, and then crank it to maybe 4.5-5ish and throw the food on as it warms up, then do the food cooking part (whatever that needs depending.)

Spicy Nacho or I send a HIMARS M30A1

It’s not legal for 16yos to carry guns in school.

Alright you’ve piqued my interest, what’s this technique? I have no problems with sticking on my buttered steel pan as is so I’m wondering if I already do something close.