knighthawk0811@lemmy.world to Programming Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoAI will replace us alllemmy.worldimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1171arrow-down160file-text
arrow-up1111arrow-down1imageAI will replace us alllemmy.worldknighthawk0811@lemmy.world to Programming Humor@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square42fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareLucy :3@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoOr: If it’s possible to create a simple algirithm, that will always be infinitely more accurate than ML.
minus-squaresnooggums@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoThat is because the algorithm has an expected output that can be tested and verified for accuracy since it works consistently every time. If there appears to be inconsistency, it is a design flaw in the algorithm.
Or: If it’s possible to create a simple algirithm, that will always be infinitely more accurate than ML.
That is because the algorithm has an expected output that can be tested and verified for accuracy since it works consistently every time. If there appears to be inconsistency, it is a design flaw in the algorithm.