• TeddE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hell is too kind and polite for the timeline we live in. We’ll probably wash up in superhell or something.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        So what you’re saying is only the right kind of people should be allowed to vote?

        I do think though that there should be some sort of basic test to prove that you actually understand the various policies an administration is pushing, not at a deep level but just the most basic surface level that you could get from a 10-minute Google search or by watching a single video. Just prove that you actually know what you’re voting for because otherwise why even vote?

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wait they aren’t going to regulate it? Didn’t he just sign some other shit saying it can’t be woke? Which is it?

    • blargle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It can be censored for not giving sufficiently MAGAfied answers or acknowledging the existence of things fascists want memory-holed.

      It can’t be sued for devouring, assimilating and plagiarizing all copyrighted media ever created.

      Two very different sorts of regulation.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well you’d have to strip out most of the history books then, oh and anything to do with social science, also get rid of all of the biology textbooks because they explain where babies come from and conservatives don’t like that sort of thing.

        Basically it’s just going to be sports statistics and gun manuals. There probably isn’t enough information in there to build an AI, as you need quite a broad base of input for it to work.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I was trying to read the EO last night and unless I’m fucked up I thought the EO pertained to just stuff the government has anything to do with? AI they would fund or aquire etc please correct me if I’m wrong I got lost in the sauce last night

  • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder if this “de-regulation” will allow or prevent AI videos of trump wandering naked through the desert?

    • burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      its less hyper intelligent machine overlord exterminating humanity, and more chatbots that cannot run a lemonade stand being tasked with managing the economy, freaking out and filling their digital diapers, and deleting everyone’s social security numbers

  • masonlee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The race to develop uncontrollable superintelligent processes for which the goal of maintaining Earth’s biosphere is a competitive disadvantage? No humans win this race.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    154
    ·
    3 days ago

    This won’t win anything. This’ll just allow USA corps to allow their products to become as shitty as possible.

    • JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Its just a proposal to remove restrictions on the building of fossil fueled power plants, plus a bit of AI generated slop about winning the AI race.

      • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s unlikely any of this will ever be profitable, the only one making profit from this right now is NVIDIA. Everyone else’s costs dwarf revenue, even just operational costs, not even counting capital expenditure to set this stuff up. None of these companies have a path to profitability, and most of the little revenue is coming from services burning investor money built upon other services that are also burning investor money, or temporary shenanigans like Microsoft trading OpenAI free compute time at their data centers in exchange for IP, or coreweave using their GPUs as collateral against loans to buy more GPUs that get collateralized in turn.

        At best the deregulation makes things less unprofitable and drags the bubble out a little longer.

        • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          thats why they are trying to cram AI into whatever services they have, google on pixels, micrsoft on its various services,etc, i think they are just trying to stem bleeding by cramming it in to everything they can.

          • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Which is an absurd thing to do! Getting it in front of more people just increases their costs by creating more load on their data centers. At best it juices investor confidence by pushing up user numbers. It’s not converting people to payed subscriptions at any significant rate, and even then people paying the subscriptions are losing them money because they’re creating way more load than their subscriptions pay for.

  • kyub@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The only “wins” for this current US regime are negative records: most cruel, most degenerate, most stupid, most racist, and so on. And the “grand prize” for these wins will be war (civil or conventional) plus a spot in history among the worst people ever to destabilize and rule a country.