• nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    DYMAXION MAP OR GTFO

    EDIT: details


    It has less distortion of relative size of areas, most notably when compared to the Mercator projection; and less distortion of shapes of areas, notably when compared to the Gall–Peters projection. Other compromise projections attempt a similar trade-off.

    More unusually, the Dymaxion map does not have any “right way up”. Fuller argued that in the universe there is no “up” and “down”, or “north” and “south”: only “in” and “out”.[9] Gravitational forces of the stars and planets created “in”, meaning “towards the gravitational center”, and “out”, meaning “away from the gravitational center”. He attributed the north-up-superior/south-down-inferior presentation of most other world maps to cultural bias.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Each region on a dymaxion map is absolutely fine though, it’s just when you put it all together it becomes god awful.

      A butterfly map is a better compromise if you need a world map.

      • nymnympseudonym@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        If you have a physical Dymaxion Map, you make each vertex a hinge so you can swing to connect the bits you want to be adjacent for the purpose at hand.

    • stickly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      This looks like when you see a weird, unflattering picture of a celebrity. Earth just woke up and hasn’t put its makeup on and you put it on blast like this