The streaming star on how to reject political violence while staying honest about Kirk’s rhetoric.

  • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’m speaking directly as compared to him not being assassinated, friend. The harm he would have gone on to do is outshadowed by the harm that will now be done as retribution for his death.

    There was always going to be violent conflict between the fascists and anti-fascists, but believe it or not he was a moderating voice in the reactionary space. Without him, the overton window shifts even further right, with voices like Shapiro becoming comparatively centrist and falling out of favor by those motivated by Kirk’s death. It’s a reason why the shooter potentially being a Groyper is both liberating and damning to leftists - it means that we can’t as easily be blamed for the escalation (we will still, though), but it also serves as a reminder that there are more violent voices still who are driving a wedge into the center of the republican party to drive them further into Nazism.

    Better to target the productive capacities of the right, rather than the beneficiaries of the right’s sugar daddies (like Kirk).

    • whiwake@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I disagree. I don’t think they are actually going to DO anything. It wasn’t a lefty. People know that. It won’t gain popular support among the MAGAs. Meanwhile, as long as it’s right-on-right, who cares.