• Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The guy looks perpetually scared that MAGA is going to notice he isn’t white.

  • lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The appeal to the manosphere is real.

    There’s a book I’ve been meaning to read: Uncivil Agreement by Lilliana Mason.

    I’ve heard it’s about how most people should be voting in alignment with their policy beliefs, but when you look at it … more people vote along with how they choose to be identified with even if it hurts them.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I think it’s their physical appearance that is being referred to. Patel looks perpetually surprised and slightly off while Kirk looked like the witch doctor fucked up while shrinking his head.

      • orioler25@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        That’s ableism. These people don’t look the way they do and don’t act they way they do because of any genetic disorder. They also aren’t going to fucking see this so the only people being insulted by this are people who are disabled, great job.

        We’re talking about actual fascists here and you guys are insulting with eugenics and appearance ffs.

        • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Thank you for saying this. We have more than enough reason to shit on these assholes for their actions and rhetoric; there’s absolutely no reason to use ableist language.

          In a similar vein, I’ve seen a lot of “weaponized” homophobic language on Lemmy (often in regards to Putin and Trump). Like you say, the only people who get hurt by this are the random queer people who read these comments.

          • orioler25@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Yeah this is very apparent all over social media. It’s the consequence of liberals who think disagreeing with the overt fascism seen in MAGA allows moral purity in their actions. They don’t actually interrogate internalized values they hold from capitalism and settler-colonialism that devalues groups of people, they just know which groups are more or less “wrong” to target. They feel emboldened by a visible and decisive enemy, which makes them less self-conscious about the bigotry they foster uncritically.

  • s@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    You’re using one flavor of bigotry to disparage another flavor of bigots?

    • FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Too many people like this unfortunately. I respect the ones who learn when pointed out and stop. The ones who double down are the worst.

    • luciferofastora@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      On one hand, yeah, not cool.

      On the other, it’s the kind of shot that just might land in the fanbase of these wankstains. It attacks and smears them in terms their supporters understand. Just pointing out the hypocrisy doesn’t work if the audience doesn’t care for reasonable argument, but by speaking their language, there’s some chance it will get under their skin.

      It’s a disgusting move in a disgusting fight. There are no winners here, and the best I can hope for is that it’ll hit the right people harder than the collateral damage hits the wrong ones.

      • mathemachristian [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        Why is insulting and getting under their skin so important? Is trolling them gonna change their mind? Are minorities literally less important than trying to make fascists feel insulted?

    • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Too few or too many usually has the same general effects–ain’t good for viability, and if you get past that often an Intellectual Disability. Though I will say that some of the coolest people I know have an Intellectual Disability.

    • ooli3@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      14 hours ago

      this is why this is funny… but most people here want a rightful white knight fight, instead of reading

      • ganryuu@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Or it’s way too close to ableism, which is something we should not use, no matter the opponent.

            • orioler25@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 hours ago

              No I’m not trying to say that you’re wrong, I’m just asserting that there isn’t doubt as to whether this is ableism. I don’t want that to discourage you from pointing out bigotry when you see it.

              • ganryuu@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 hours ago

                I understood that, and I will continue to point it out, don’t worry about it. But your precision was necessary.

  • orioler25@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ableism. What a funny joke dude. Could you explain what specifically they’re referring to about missing chromosomes that would make someone a fascist?

  • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    So can I ask: is it acceptable to edit this screenshot to not include the ableist part (just crop out the whole Avengers part honestly, it’s not funny anyway) and take out the handles of the posters, and repost? Or is that poor form?

    • causepix@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Maybe post it wherever you’re going to post it with the first line as the title? Wouldn’t want anyone to seek out the original tweet and bring traffic to this guy’s ableism, best to pretend it doesn’t exist.

      Edit: or do that thing that meme reposters do and just put the text over a white background with the original tweet (see below for an example)

      Example

      (pretend the crayon is a tweet)

      A picture of a crayon sitting below a witty caption :::

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Memes are a form of cultural transmission. They’re like a type of public art, meant to be freely shared, edited, and otherwise played around with by whoever. It’s how memes morph and evolve over time.

      All this to say, you can probably go ahead and make the meme yours if you wish.

    • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      huh. are we going fast and sloppy or are we being artisans? because i would agree that it’s acceptable to remove the ableism, but we’d want to keep the date, right? do we black box it or do we cut out the middle?