Did the printer run out of ink for 8. and 9.?
Just a 4 chan thread post copy pasta. Got no clue who did the crop but it wasn’t me. I’m just injecting some stuff I haven’t seen on the threadiverse yet that looked interesting. Just doing my part.
I know 8 is his mentor Roy Cohn, one of the all time greatest pieces of shit. I’m a big fan of his patch on the AIDS quilt
Is there anyone with any sense that doesn’t know the President of the US is a child rapist by now?
Only people trained to bury their head in the sand against all factual infomation, no matter how obvious. But who are these people?
Religious people are trained every single day to believe complete fictional lies, and to ignore all physical evidence that would prove otherwise.
They’re trained chumps. Trained from birth to be suckers for fictional religions, they’re the only people stupid enough to look the other way when told to do so.
It is more complex than this. I was born into this life and have escaped.
Dogma is creating tribalism in religion. There are relatively few people that are fully committed to the dogma. The main issue that makes religion such a persistent institution is the mutually exclusive social support network, aka the tribe. Giving up one’s social support network is evolutionarily harmful behavior. Dogma and tribalism are structured around dichotomous logic; the oversimplification of us versus them.
When anyone opposes such a person or group directly, in practice it only helps to reinforce their biases and strengths their resolve. Likewise, logic from outsiders is rejected blindly. The logic, and in truth, all human learning to the point of understanding only comes from within a person. Anyone can memorize information, but an abstract fundamental understanding is not part of rote memorization. These may be correlated in some instances, but are not causal in association. Thus why you may have done well in many aspects of schooling that you have no memory of years later.
The only ways you can attack the dogma and tribalism is through stimulation of the individual’s curiosity. Any stimulation of curiosity leads to self growth, and through this self growth the person will eventually question their own dogma naturally. Most of the most toxic religions hate higher education. They believe it to be the sinful culture at these institutions that leads their little believer children astray. They have no ability to grasp how higher learning stimulates the growth needed to question one’s dogmas.
Lastly, if the complex task of stimulating curiosity is too much trouble, the other facet of reinforcement is the network of social support. If you are unwilling to openly and tangibly support members of a foreign tribe on their path of self growth, you are actually part of the fundamental problem that is building their fortress higher and causing potential escalation of conflict.
This is the messy reality of the situation with religion, dogma, and tribalism.
WELL stated! I have an interesting, I think, hypothesis about conservatives, religious people and education. I’d value your take. And we must keep in mind that, in America anyway, education was lauded until sometime 20-odd years ago.
They see their children getting educated, and they’re not liking the results.
One problem is that the world has changed by leaps and bounds never seen in human history, leaps and bounds we didn’t evolve to handle. Now their kids are coming home and telling them they’re wrong about so many things. I was trying to tell my mother she was killing the yard. “Where did you learn all this smarty pants?” “In the horticulture classes you sent me to college for.” She killed damned near everything but the sorry looking grass.
You send your kid off to college and he comes back a different person. The horror! I would expect and hope for that, but for some they only see their child leaving the tribe. As you said, that’s been dangerous in our past.
Another problem is that educated people tend towards the left side of the political spectrum, tend towards losing their religion. This has to be explained. What? Are you calling us stupid?! They have to explain this to themselves. The only way out is to say the colleges are indoctrinating our youth.
I first saw this when Rush Limbaugh was attacking “ivory tower libruls”. Before that I had not noticed education in the crosshairs, not on the national stage. “Education is not the issue per se, it’s the liberals who have taken over and are brainwashing our children.” Pat answer, ain’t it?
The other issues are as you stated, no need to reiterate what you so very well wrote. Shit. Wrote all that and I think all I did was put your words in a poorer format.
Epstein is great because there’s a lot more evidence than just a photo. But you could probably find Bernie Sanders in a picture together with an equally number of unsavoury people, because that’s just the nature of being a public figure
Exactly. This post is kind of a nothingburger as far as incriminating evidence goes. How about when Trump slyly said that Epstein likes his girls young? How about the birthday letter where he talks about their secrets and enigmas? Anyone with half a brain knows that Trump at the very least knew what Epstein was up to.
Nope, nothing incriminating, but this sort of thing is aiming for the court of public opinion. And for once MAGA seems somewhat swayed by the whole Epstein thing. Seems the only crack we’ve found to turn them.
I was gonna say, if you’re rich, powerful or influential, you’re going to catch some pics with dirtbags. Not like you can know everyone you’re introduced to. But there sure seems to be a theme going with Trump.
Tick tock, donny. Do your worst. Burn your own country to the ground in order to deflect. The truth is slippery and will find it’s way toward the light. Tick tock, donny.
Can you imagine what’s in those files? So bad the legislature shut the government down to protect it?
For those not in the know, we got a new Congresswoman who is the final vote needed to force disclosure and the Speaker, Mike Johnson, shut the government down to avoid swearing her in. Funny thing, he’s never refused to swear anyone in before.
Well, she can’t force the disclosure vote, but she can force a vote in the House, bypassing the Speaker. And now it’s a vote that’s sure to win.
Also, can you believe this thing might actually be the nail in his coffin? FINALLY?!
We have to press the attack on the streets, IRL. See a MAGA flag? Scream “Pedophile!” at their house. See ‘em on the streets? "Check out this guy, loving his child fuckin’ President."
Once this shit hits, becomes undeniable, official record? I have a 3’x5’ blank canvas ready to lay cut vinyl on. Hanging it in the front yard with an arrow towards my double-flag waving MAGA neighbor. “All in favor of child molesters? MAGA unite!” (Anyone’s got better text, I’m all ears.)
They can shrug off insults like “racist” or “fascist”, but they got a real fucking problem with “pedophile”. Grow a pair and confront them. LOL, neighbor called the cops on me when I called him a fucking fascist and his wife a fat, little froggy cunt. And no, I didn’t say a word to the pigs other than, “No threat were exchanged and that’s all you need to know. Good day.” That’s important! A threat is battery, you going to jail for a night or three. Screamed at him to “die in a fire”, an old internet insult to me. Good enough for snowflake to call the cops.
Yeah, the pigs threatened me. “If you won’t tell us what happened I can go get a warrant for <some bullshit charge I forget>.” My reply? “OK.” Imagine that. “You don’t give up your 5th Amendment right, I’ll arrest you, uh, sometime later, maybe.” For any that have read all this bullshit, I fucked up in not asserting my 5th Amendment right to shut the fuck up. You must state that assertion! That’s when they give the hell up and walk away.
So, this proves if everyone takes a photo with a celebrity, then everyone includes unsavory people?
No. Obviously any celebrity is going to be in situations like this at times. You may walk past a place where someone has been murdered, but that does not mean you are involved. When you’ve been spotted with blood on your clothing, and some people say you were there, and you know the murdered person, and you have been associating with other murderers, to say you are the same as someone just walking by is logically insane. To call that a conspiracy is to lack due diligence. There is a truth in the statistics, and the associations. When you are part of a toxic spurious culture, there will be many instances where one is photographed with members of the group. He was charged with rape and convicted. Giving the benefit of the doubt is foolish.
blood on your clothing
Argue with logic instead of guilt by association fallacy. Where’s the “blood on their clothing”?
charged with rape and convicted
of adults.
Photos of public figures with practically anyone are expected. Next, try the same approach with Madonna or any well-connected person.
Giving the benefit of the doubt
Merely logic: it isn’t conclusive. The allegations existed for ages, yet the FBI under multiple Democratic & Republican administrations didn’t seem to act as though they had enough conclusive evidence to pursue charges: why is that?
The information is easily available. I don’t take anyone arguing seriously any more. There is no debate to be had.
