What an odd thing to say…
Hopefully one of the AI-touting CEOs first.
fucking what?
tesla already beats them there, in the testing department.
On Reddit they were celebrating Waymo coming to London
We are? Huh.
Maybe that someone is a CEO?
I would not shed a tear if that happened.
CEOs are generally heartless asshats.
This puts a spin on the article (which, admittedly, could have its own spin), that smells disingenuous.
She wasn’t saying “yeah, those bozos will be fine in our shoddy bots run down grannies on the crosswalk”, in a mask-off moment. The article was saying Waymo expects someone will be fatally struck by one of their vehicles eventually, but society will have accepted (Waymo’s) driverless cars enough by then that it won’t break the company. “They’ll see Waymo is so much safer than normal drivers even if it still does cause some accidents.” type shit.
It’s still wishful corpo-speak but there’s no reason to mislead.
Edit: I understand that it is the headline of the article itself but we should do better than regurgitating and echoing clickbait titles.
mainstream “journalism” is about rage baiting engagement. Anytime an article has an inflammatory title about what someone says 95% of the time they are being misquoted. In these hundreds of comments I’ve only seen your comment mentioning that. No one questions anything anymore, if its about something they don’t like then it must be true. Even though the futurism article directly links the article its talking about and the full quote/context of what the ceo was saying. I’m not a fan of waymo (and certainly not google’s evil ways) but facts seem to be a distant ancient theory these days. Pitchforks first then think later.
idk if the author chose that title maybe its futurism itself but a more accurate description would have been something like “our cars are safe but we are also prepared/preparing for when something bad happens”. That doesn’t get clicks tho.
not it
Are they volunteering?
We can always make it not so voluntary.
Amazing how far the US will go to not use rail and maintain dependency on cars… just wow.
We will make the most complex convoluted contrivances before laying down steel and locomotives. Funny part I always liked about the I, Robot movie. No, we didn’t have public transport, everyone just has self-driving cars on roads controlled by a centralized AI.
lol. What a time to be alive my friend.
developing the fast rail system, at least in california, it was blocked by musk and the gop(elaine chao in trumps 1st term, mitch mcconells wife). cali never tried again.
Society wasn’t even ready for a waymo to kill a cat
Instead of running a red light or hitting a pole self-driving cars drive full speed under a trailer and decapitate everybody, or someone falls against the car and it detects an accident and decides to pull over and slooowly runs over the person and drags them down the street ignoring all the screaming. The kind of accidents society is desensitized to are the ones they taught the car how to avoid, the fucked up shit where somebody gets hydraulically pressed to death in slow motion while 15 people film it on their phones is what Waymo is going to do.
Atleast with the running over pedestrian scenario, I would think the passengers have a manual way to interrupt program logic/stop.
Also, you’d best believe truck decapitations happened a lot without self driving, enough to mandate that trailers have those guardrails below their unloading doors.
The dragging incident actually happened in 2024 with a different self-driving car company (Cruise by General Motors) https://www.ktvu.com/news/cruise-fined-500000-filing-false-report-about-driverless-car-dragging-pedestrian.amp They tried to cover it up too. By the end of that year, GM had stopped funding Cruise and driverless taxis, and is now focusing only on driver-assist features.
Yeah, they had to change things, the person was hit by a human driver and flung in the self driving cars path and the human driver drove off. The self driving car didn’t know what to do and dragged the body to the side of the road basically. None of these incidents took place by a Waymo vehicle though. Waymo has had to shoulder the shit that Tesla and other companies have put out. GM as you said making that “mistake”.
I really dont know why there arent big E stop buttons like on every other large piece of equipment that can severely harm you
Im assuming they wanted to avoid having people get hit from behind when stopped in the middle of the road, hence the whole auto pull over thing.
But yeah they should still have a kill switch, maybe make it activate the slow and pull over protocol above a certain speed, or dead stop if operating at a slow speed?
Bold to say that openly. Will be used in court later.
“Knew or should have known”
I think society is ready and eager for CEOs to be hunted like animals, as the United Healthcare case showed.
