Edit: /j

        • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 day ago

          even so. it isn’t a joke and more a reflection of what you think. at least that what it sounds like. don’t blame the audience for the way your joke is interpreted

            • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              I just don’t get how saying a statement you believe is wrong without any indication of it as a joke.

              Seems more reminiscent to people who say something shitty, then when they get complaints say “it was a joke, bro”.

              And I personally have no patience for that. Also, there is no punchline, it is just a BS quote.

                • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  You can’t just say something with no tone indicator (I do not mean “/s”, I mean any indication that it is sarcasm LiKe ThIs, or a clear exaggeration, or an obvious reference…)

                  I can’t just say “Socialism is wrong because people are cunts.” and be like, it is clearly sarcasm. that is at best being a Schrodinger’s asshole.

                  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    ·
                    20 hours ago

                    The sarcasm is in taking the common false argument against Marxism and directly showing how absurd that argument actually is by forcing it into a vignette for the viewer, ie a Marx that actually forgot human nature and suddenly realized it destroys his arguments and analysis. That absurd situation highlights the absurdity of the argument.