• Ferrous@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    No 4k120Hz. bummer. To be fair, 4k120hz is not a primary market pull.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Eh, that’s not really how it works. It all comes down to the HDMI standard. The HDMI 2.0 used by the steam box has a max officially supported output of 4k60hz. You need HDMI 2.1 to get 4k 120hz - regardless of the capability of your machine.

    • brrt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeh this will make it a tough choice for me. Have an OLED TV and playing something like Hades 2 in 4K120 would be really nice. Maybe a USBC hub/adapter could do the trick but that’s kinda weird and an extra cost. Definitely dampened my hype for it sadly.

      • mephiska@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        They’re becoming more common though. The Sony oled I just got does 4k120. I’m bummed it doesn’t have hdmi 2.1 though. VRR would have been nice but maybe the hardware is powerful enough it won’t need it.

      • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I do 120 hz on my TV. With PS5 and Xbox I think market for it is bigger than you would think for 120 hz TVs among gamers who picked up new TVs when they got their new console.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Right, like I said, 4k120hz is a very limited market. However, for those of us with living room OLEDs, 4k120hz would be very much appreciated. The couch gaming experience on a 77 inch 4k120hz oled is pretty wicked.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Fair enough. The displayport has limited use though, given how there aren’t many (any?) large 4k120hz televisions with displayport. And let me be clear, that’s no dig against displayport (which is the better standard). As far as I know, certain shady license deals keep hdmi artificially ubiquitous on televisions.

        • vividspecter@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          20 hours ago

          That same shadiness is why AMD GPUs can’t directly support HDMI 2.1 on Linux. But there are workarounds like DP to HDMI converters or using 4:2:0 which is tolerable for non-HDR gaming at least (not so much general PC use).