https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8M_6jbcI3U0

Evan Prodromou is often called “The father of the Fediverse”. It’s amazing how much overlap there is between the aims of WordPress and Fediverse. These two communities should work together more! The Fediverse consists of independent social networking platforms including Mastodon (micro-blogging), PeerTube (videos), Pixelfed (images) and more.

Just like WordPress, most of the Fediverse runs on open source code. And just like WordPress, you get to create content that isn’t swallowed by corporate algorithms. And you can build successful business or communities on your platforms that you own control.

We talk with Evan about the origins and evolution of the Fediverse. Evan has played a key role in building several early Fediverse sites such as Wikitravel, Identi.ca, and StatusNet. He also helped to develop Activity Pub which the key protocol that enables Fediverse to talk to each other.

  • Björn@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    There already are working plugins for that. When I @ a Lemmy community in a WordPress post it gets posted to that community. And comments from Lemmy or Mastodon are also visible on WordPress.

  • Auster@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I think proposals like Bridgy Fed and Minds.com are better, bridges run by independent groups, instead of changes being forced onto the underlying engine. When the latter is done, devs need to make changes based on the smallest common denominator, slowing or even halting individual development of environments. Bridges at least are developed adjacent to multiple environments instead of having to change fundamentals.

    • julian@activitypub.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      56 minutes ago

      [email protected] may I ask you to expand in what you mean by “underlying engine”?

      If you’re talking about ActivityPub then it’s a open standard which isn’t beholden to any one organization. It’s like saying HTML is bad because websites are all forced to use it as the underlying engine.

      I personally feel that the technical and mental overhead of maintaining a bridge is much worse than the overhead of a slowly changing standard. What if there are bridges for 20 different protocols, 200? When does it get unwieldy?