• IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    18 hours ago

    And think of the world we would create if this were the norm.

    The majority of people everywhere are ambitious, industrious and want to be useful. So you’d end up with a world full of people doing creative things … and entire groups of people doing creative, inventive and useful things together.

    They’d figure out things like building space elevators, new industrial technologies, the cure for cancer (which would probably be redundant because everyone would automatically be able to afford to take care of their health), stabilize global warming, create alternate forms and sources of energy and begin the process of exploring space beyond our own system.

    Instead, we have a world where a hundred people own all the wealth, a billion people who think they’re wealthy but aren’t and 7 billion people struggling to get by … and all of them fighting to become king or queen of the world.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The best argument for UBI isn’t that it’s an inherently decent thing to do, it’s that it would legitimately make the world better for rich people too.

      • paperazzi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        UBI would never work with rich people in the world. The unfettered American form of a capitalist system is incompatible with life because the rich will never stop trying to take ALL the money, better world be damned. The system must be changed first.