So I just read Bill Gates’ 1976 Open Letter To Hobbyists, in which he whines about not making more money from his software. You know, instead of being proud of making software that people wanted to use. And then the bastard went on and made proprietary licences for software the industry standard, holding back innovation and freedom for decades. What a douche canoe.

  • General_Effort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I really don’t get how opinions on intellectual property and its “theft” turn 180 whenever AI is mentioned.

    • FoundFootFootage78@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m on the side of abolishing intellectual property, with the caveats that commercializing someone else’s work or taking credit for someone else’s work should be illegal.

      If there wasn’t a profit mode we’d get much less “slop art” and more challenging art made with passion. The slop would also be far less off-putting.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      ai is the rich stealing from us, piracy is usually us taking it from the rich.

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      One day chat got won’t work without a paid subscription…

      Intellectual property as a concept is a cancer to humanity, and we’d be in a much better world without it.

      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        This is shy they want Wikipedia and internet archive, etc, killed off. They have it for their training data but they won’t have a profitable model via paid subscriptions without a monopoly on information.

          • untorquer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            38 minutes ago

            Yes but we’re in the bait and switch phase of it. They’re pushing the AI responses at the top of search to cut down the through clicking to Wikipedia. They’re trying to capture behavior by being the lowest effort route to an answer. They’re gambling that people will forget these other sites and then stop donating. Then it’s to the courts until they’re too broke to keep the servers online.

            The information will still be free, but maybe obfuscated enough that most people accept [erratic] information as a service.