• network_switch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 hours ago

    As others, my basic home lab NAS plans are grounding to a stop because of worsening prices. Next up, phones are going to be even more expensive. Video game console price increases again

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    4% is hardly a spike in the scheme of things. That’s just inflation when things aren’t really coming down in price any more.

    I bought a drive a year or so ago and was surprised how expensive it was. At some point the price just stopped dropping. Presumably there’s a limit on how cheap you can make a spinning rust drive before it just doesn’t work any more.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      For the vast part of the world, that is not the us or the EU, a PC, specially a very powerful one like for gaming, has always been an expensive luxury item. You’re just joining the club late.

      • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Those other parts are turbo fucked now though. I guess I’ll keep my video game consoles going because at least they will always be able to play games; especially all my older ones.

  • 4am@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It sounds conspiratorial to say it seems like they are trying to crash the consumer market so that computing will be entirely dependent on their services, but I mean…

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I think that seems obvious, not conspiratorial.

      They want to make their services cheaper for them to run, and they want to sell them for more money, while buying up hardware so nobody else can compete with them or not depend on them.

    • phx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I was thinking on that yesterday.Mass local storage affordable? No no no, better to drive those prices way up so that we can sell you “cloud” services instead.

    • paultimate14@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s classic rent seeking. We will own nothing, just lease a low-powered client device from our phone carrier or ISP and do everything in the cloud with AI.

      That seems to be the plan from these megacorps anyways.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They are trying and they are succeeding. But the bright side is - it’s about resources. Storage, computation. You can run most useful things on an RPi. I suppose home PC market will become more similar to 80s again. Less power, more dreaming.

    • WanderingThoughts@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      It’s because the average USA citizen is economically irrelevant. The money is in the top 10% and the big corpos, especially AI with all the money sloshing around there. The 90% consumer market doesn’t matter as much these days.

      • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        14 hours ago

        As the wealth divide continues to grow, the richest will continue to care less and less about the rest of us. We believe in our foundational myth that they’ll always need us somehow, even as they go out of their way to make it utterly obvious that they won’t be happy until they can replace literally everything us dirty poor working class people do. When they no longer need us, they will start to dispose of us. Arguably, they’ve begun doing that already. War is good for business, and for population control.

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The thing is, if they collapse the economy, and nobody can afford to buy their overpriced products, they’re going to suffer too - which is good, it shouldn’t be only us suffering.

          • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Are they going to suffer? That’s what we’re supposed to believe, but remember that money is a human-made concept that only has value because we collectively give it value, and the economy is built on that very important principle.

            That situation you describe is real, it will disrupt their efforts a little and protect us in the short term, but in the long term, the meaning of money and economy is changing. they’re doing everything they can to use automation to build a new post-scarcity economy based on ownership, membership, services and control. And beyond that, it frankly doesn’t include us or even think about us.

            That’s what the wealth divide is. It’s the way that money, as an economic representation of their values, is telling us that their motivations are not about making all existing humans on this planet more comfortable and productive and independent. In their vision of this future economy, they are instead hoarding humanity’s collective efforts for themselves, reinvesting it into their own technology, They focus their efforts on what they personally consider important for “progress”, chasing their own utopian ideals for the specific goals and groups they consider the best and most important, while the rest of us that aren’t part of those goals or groups are pacified and left behind and, if you really think it out, eventually eliminated. After all, a utopia won’t include teeming, growing masses of humanity using up all the available resources, that would be a plague, and they eventually will decide to cure it if they haven’t already started. Their vision of the future only needs to have enough room for them and the more utopian they make it the less of us there will be. They want to be the main characters, we’re just nameless extras who do chores and fill in the background for now and can be ignored to go wherever extras are supposed to go when they’re no longer on the screen.

            Their view of humanity is abstract, and they believe what they are doing is right, all the way down to the core of their being. They simply don’t value humanity’s rich tapestry of lived experiences or the sanctity of every individual human life. They’ll never make it a priority. They care more about making sure humanity has become “advanced” or is multi-planetary than they do about making sure every human has a home, or food. That’s their vision. It’s about humanity as a whole, not about individual humans. We can all be sacrificed so the species becomes safer. Scientifically, I can’t even say they’re wrong. But philosophically, I hope we can all agree that this is deeply wrong and morally bankrupt. We need to start to reclaim our individual humanity and go back to putting people first. We need to care about people in the present, and always, not just the abstract idea of humanity’s future. We need to take our money back and use it for a different kind of progress.

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          As the wealth divide continues to grow, the richest will continue to care less and less about the rest of us.

          Of all the things to pick from socialism, expecting the rich to care should be the last one.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      If the demand increases enough, more factories will be built. Right?

      Except most people think it’s a bubble, so won’t risk building and the cost to build factories that technical is so large that most big companies outsource it, never mind new entrants.

      I suspect instead well move more towards a data on demand kind of thing. We don’t need the same thing stored in millions of copies worldwide. Cheaper connectivity and containerization should help, I’d think.

      It will start with rarely used large files like isos, which are already pretty efficiently distributed but then move to more and more, like cdns do for web already.

      I’m just hypothesizing…I’ve nothing to base it on, but it seems redundant to have so much duplication.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It seems like I’ll soon have to use my DVD burner yet again. Now only if I found one for my ThinkPad, as it’s one of the last models that still had an option for it.

  • fox2263@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I was waiting for them to come down in order to get another for my NAS. Now they’re gonna go up again instead. Fuck me

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      This isn’t a huge increase. It’s not on the order of what just happened with RAM.

      According to a report from Digitimes Asia (quoting Nikkei), HDD contract prices jumped roughly 4% quarter over quarter in Q4 2025.

  • Wooki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Economic policies will start shifting to inflation reducing by raising interest rates. This is purely inflationary in all economies and it’s hilariously going to tank stock trading.