• quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Do people think he just had child whores at every dinner? Just because someone attended a dinner with Epstein doesn’t mean they’re a pedophile

    • INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I agree that you could sit down with someone and not know they are doing such a thing, but we now know he was doing it, and it should be shamed not dismissed.

      Also. ‘child whores’…? Way to be a piece of shit 😬 jeeeesus christ

    • Guy Ingonito@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s 2016, you show up to an event. There is a photographer, and Jeffrey Epstein. How many photos are you taking with him?

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      But the “pay no attention to the pedos” article isn’t exactly a good look in that context, is it?

    • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It depends on where the photo was taken and context, if possible.

      But why would he say we shouldn’t focus on them? That’s inexplicable.

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah I mean honestly unless there’s direct evidence that the person did absolutely know that about him personally I’m gonna need a lot more. Not everyone is going to have encyclopedic knowledge of every criminal and what they’ve done and being on the look out every second of every day.

      Did this guy write articles about Epstein before this? Then yeah he knew for sure