• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Well, yeah. The definition of “continent” is arbitrary.

    I could argue that there are only four, for instance (America, Afro-Eurasia, Antarctica, and Australia).

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Well yes, it is entirely arbitrary. One of the most agreed-upon factors is that “at least as big as Australia” is a requirement, but there’s no hard reason for that requirement

        Personally I think we should consider particarly big mountain ranges and deserts as continental boundaries more often, like we do with the Urals in nodels that separate Asia and Europe. “Asia” is such a huge concept as to be almost useless, and it’s not like China and Arabia had much influence on each other historically

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You do have “regions” already kind of filling that niche. MENA, Europe, Central Asia, East Asia and so on.