• TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I hope the Iranian people can oust their corrupt and inept government.

    Also, coming soon to a blue state U.S. city.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It’s really cool tech but I think it’s much better suited to natural disaster/grid/comms collapse situations. It is trivially easy to either jam or overwhelm the mesh if a bad actor wanted, making it not the greatest in a situation where you’re organizing against a government. I mean it would probably be great for a while until the govt caught on.

      Or at least that’s my assumption

    • AreaKode@riskeratspizza.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I’d encourage anybody thinking about protesting to check out Meshtastic. You can get a basic device for less than $25. Connect to your phone with bluetooth, and you can communicate with anyone nearby with encryption without using the internet.

      • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Don’t take your phone to a protest. Even if you turn it off or in airplane mode. iPhones ping the Find My network even when turned off for instance and Google has their own version of the same thing. Feature phones, insofar as they still exist won’t save you either, in the US all cellular devices are required to have a GPS built in (it was part of the same law that made the Amber Alert).

        • otacon239@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          There are also standalone Meshtastic devices that don’t require your phone as a medium, but obviously they’re far less intuitive than an app.

          Would it be still too risky to take an old phone that no longer has a SIM, running a custom ROM, and only tethered to one of these? Or would the Bluetooth still be too traceable?

          • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            No SIM wouldn’t really make any difference, all (US) phones must be able to make a 911 call even if they aren’t currently in service (that’s what SOS in the signal meter means too, you aren’t roaming or don’t have roaming turned on but the rival carrier’s tower that you are hitting legally must allow you to make a 911 call). Just because your carrier doesn’t support those frequencies anymore doesn’t mean there aren’t other carriers that do or that the mobile cell tower spoofers won’t still scan for those frequencies. If you trust that it will stay in airplane mode and that the custom rom’s Bluetooth stack is locked down enough to not ping any Find My devices or similar then maybe but standalone Meshtastic device sounds like the best bet to me, or maybe something like IP over HAM radio. Maybe it’s time to dust off the Cybiko!!!

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          What about a phone running Graphene OS in an anti-static bag?

          Or what about a Pinephone with the hardware switch for the cellular modem turned off?

          • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            17 hours ago

            An anti-static bag wouldn’t do anything. I assume you mean the Faraday cage bags, which would prevent your phone from pinging anything as would a hardware switch but wouldn’t prevent them from searching it if you get arrested.

      • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 hours ago

        rat them out? Do you think that a xitterlink transceiver can stay concealed?

        it’s probably somebody at some embassy or something where police can’t touch them

      • optissima@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        I just wondered how many of them existed in the country total. Aren’t they expensive? I would’ve thought that sanctions would limit access to them.