okay, first off: hey, what the fuck?

mozilla has a A THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED MILLIONS of dollars? what were all them cookie sales for thunderbird? oh yeah, they have this shell game of interlinked but not really entities so you can play whack-a-mole till the death of the universe.

and they wanna burn it dicking around with AI? fuck each and every ghoul steering that ship into the abyss, and they can take Gnome’s fucking shaman or whatwasit with them.

is everybody insane, “silicon valley” was supposed to be a satire, these cretins make mike judge seem like a prophet…

  • DocumentingDecline@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 minutes ago

    The big companies are burning down the planet building datacenters to run pointless AI so we’re going to combat that by… building datacenters to run AI?

    If they actually wanted to rebel against it they would build low energy tools to detect and remove AI spam and encourage people not to engage with this shit at all.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    How I interpret this :

    • Oh no, the very trend and thus powerful corporations are doing something stupid that does not work, let’s copy them!

    instead of just watch the sideline as they keep on pouring more resources with nothing to show for it except the buzz they keep so hard on trying to maintain.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    …I actually wouldn’t be against this.

    But it isn’t even genuine. They’ve forked llama.cpp into a broken clone like about 500 other corporations, instead of just contributing to shit that actually works and is used, and… that’s about it.

    That’s about par for the AI industry.

  • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I love star wars but fuck I hate it too so much.

    an AI ‘rebel alliance’

    Criiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinge

  • limer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Might be imagining it, but I think there is enough proof somewhere that some Mozilla board members were paid or extorted by google to sabotage the organization

    • brianpeiris@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      You really don’t need to reach for conspiracy when the entirety of silicon valley has gone AI crazy.

      • orc_princess@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I think they’re talking about how Mozilla has consistently made bad decisions for years at this point. Not necessarily because of Google though, they probably just don’t care.

    • kurcatovium@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      A lot of people don’t understand the fact that without Firefox there won’t be any Waterfox, Librewolf, Ironfox, Fennec, etc. So despite Mozilla doing some really, really stupid shit we should all keep our fingers crossed the browser somehow manage to survive their leadership.

  • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I wouldn’t be against it but… You don’t need to support companies or nonprofits, we already got DeepSeek and Qwen which are open source, they don’t need money, but they’re also not going to go that way because they’re Chinese. So they basically want some Western alternative, sure, whatever.

  • DeckPacker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Servo and Ladybird can’t come fast enough man. I hope, that they are mature before Mozilla inevitabley crashes into the fucking ground.

    • DeckPacker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I actually think servo has a much better chance of making it, because it is better managed, supported by the Linux Foundation and their lead devs don’t give weird right-wing vibes like “Andreas Kling”.

      • Björn@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Weren’t they forced by the EU to allow non-Webkit browsers?

        Although by now it’s probably to late. Making a app on another engine is basically a totally new project.

        • ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The EU is not a big enough market to justify a whole new, free iOS browser with a different engine that doesn’t work elsewhere. Which is why this EU policy was effectively useless.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          I think it’s rather that they’re still forced to use Webkit everywhere but the EU and financially it probably doesn’t make sense to port Gecko to iOS when worldwide iOS has pretty small marketshare. iOS only holds over 50% marketshare in USA, Canada, Australia, Japan, Norway, Sweden, and Iceland. In most EU countries it’s under 30% marketshare. Android literally dominates in all of Mexico, South America, Africa, and Asia, in other words, far too many countries to list, most of which iOS has less than 10% marketshare.

          Why would you go through so much trouble for arguably such a small slice of the world’s iOS market when the majority of the iOS market will still be forced to use Webkit?