• HailSeitan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Exactly. The number of people on Lemmy who simp for Valve’s monopoly just because Epic (along with every game developer, big or small) stands to benefit is kind of shocking.

      • Pollo_Jack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        It isn’t a monopoly because they don’t require you to use their store. Epic has a monopoly of epic exclusive games.

        • HailSeitan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 hour ago

          And ecommerce sellers don’t “have to” sell on Amazon, so they don’t have any market power they can abuse to extract 40-50% fees from sellers, right?

          • Pennomi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            46 minutes ago

            They don’t. My small business sells direct from our site instead of in Amazon, and we do okay.

              • Pennomi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                39 minutes ago

                While that’s true, counterexamples are great ways to disprove overreaching implications like “companies must sell on Amazon to be successful”.

                It is not a requirement. It might be the most profitable way to run an e-commerce business (in which case you’re obviously benefiting from the system Amazon created).

                • HailSeitan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  27 minutes ago

                  Nobody thinks that it’s impossible, which is incredibly rare, but rather that it’s very costly not to comply, which is the source of every monopolist’s power. Could Pepsi refuse to sell at Walmart to avoid the huge wholesale discounts they demand over smaller stores? Sure, but it would shoot themselves in the foot, and that’s the source of Walmart’s anticompetitive power, which coerces Pepsi (and lots of other suppliers) and hurts lots of smaller businesses who don’t get the same discount.