• FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Because it’s free, convenient, and works. And it’s a git project so the code is already distributed, so if Trump has another tantrum and decides the EU can’t use any American tech, the deleted PRs and issues would be annoying but we’ll still have the code.

          • Ephera@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Well, the point is that GitHub is owned by Microsoft, so if they’re already developing an alternative to a Microsoft service, they would probably want to also use an alternative to a Microsoft service for their source code hosting.

            • FishFace@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              They want to be less dependent on US tech. Using something whose code is hosted on US tech is far less dependent than using something whose entire everything is American.

    • stormdelay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I couldn’t find any particular justification going through their website and other communication, it’s not perfect but it’s probably not that big a deal for an open source project to host their code their? If I remember I’ll try to send them a message asking about it