WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed California to use a new voter-approved congressional map that is favorable to Democrats in this year’s elections, rejecting a last-ditch plea from state Republicans and the Trump administration.

No justices dissented from the brief order denying the appeal without explanation, which is common on the court’s emergency docket.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Yeah he’ll send out a check and say it’s paid for by the tariffs or something.

    I also think sending ICE to intimidate voters is likely. Might even be seizing voter registration data to make a list of enemies that need to be harassed and intimidated into not voting.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I also think sending ICE to intimidate voters is likely.

      He can try, but there’s no reason to think the 2026 elections won’t be a repeat of the 2025 elections, where two dozen red districts flipped in several states, many of which Donald won by double digits in 2024. ICE doesn’t have the manpower to handle that level of unpopularity, and dialing up the violence will only exacerbate Donald’s unpopularity further.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I think there’s reason to believe that voter intimidation works; that’s how Reconstruction was defeated and how the white minority dominated minority-majority districts for nearly a century. White terrorism was basically the norm through most of US history.

        The regime is acting like popularity is irrelevant, and that only approval from their base matters. I think that tells us their plans.

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          The regime is acting like popularity is irrelevant, and that only approval from their base matters.

          The key word here is ‘acting’.

          And, at the same time, ignoring all evidence to the contrary, resulting in the recent bloodbaths at the polls. I’m fine with them shooting themselves in the foot in their refusal to approach electoral politics like grownups.

          Voter intimidation only works if you know who to intimidate, and clearly, they do not. It’s why they stopped with the crazy overt gerrymandering.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            The recent bloodbaths at the polls are happening without voter intimidation, hence, they’re going to start employing it.

            Why do you think Tulsi Gabbard just raided Georgia? They want a list of the people they need to intimidate.

            • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              without voter intimidation

              I don’t follow. Their entire campaign of aggression has been against Democrats and Democratic areas.

              It is voter intimidation, and not only did it backfire, it destroyed their own coalition. They’re losing by double digits in both red and blue districts, and I don’t see how voter intimidation works when both sides have turned on you.

              Yes, the Georgia thing looks bad now, just like all the EO’s that took weeks and months for the courts to invalidate. Checks and balances are working, they just don’t work instantaneously.