• symbolstumble@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m sorry, what? How am I a time vampire? This is an open forum. I should be free to share where I stand. Just as you are free to share your standpoint, and attempt to engage in debate. You may not always get what you want in this life, and that’s ok too. It might be that there simply isn’t much debate to be had. Your engagement with these “tools” is directly and actively harming those who provided the data that built them. That is a fact, not opinion. I’m not sure if you consider yourself an artist or a programmer or whatever, but let me ask you this: If you along with several other chatbot prompters were to line up your individual products, would a viewer be able to spot the difference? Would any difference there be specifically attributed to any individual chatbot prompter?

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      36 minutes ago

      At what point were you engaged in debate? You act bewildered that someone tried to critically examine your assertions. I’ve been asking questions from your opinion. Do you not recognize your own stated beliefs?

      That is a fact, not opinion.

      Incorrect. Locally running ComfyUI or Ollama neither picks their pockets nor breaks their bones. When these cloud companies crash, local models aren’t going anywhere, and they won’t do psychic damage to someone whose DeviantArt posts were in the training data.

      Would any difference there be specifically attributed to any individual chatbot prompter?

      In one shot, probably not. After a week of fucking around to pursue a specific idea in each person’s head, almost certainly. Then again, you could have one group of people prompt a hundred images total, and a completely different group each pick their favorite ten, and that non-interactive selection would reveal individual aesthetic internality. Curation is not creation, but it requires identifying a work’s shortcomings, even if you won’t correct them yourself.

      Would a demonstrable difference change your conclusion? Like, is this line of questioning relevant, or are we just saying words recreationally?