• e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Codeberg is cool but I would prefer not having all FOSS project centralised on another platform. In my opinion projects of the size of Godot should consider using their own infrastructure.

      • Routhinator@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Hosting a public code repo can be expensive, however they can run a private repo using Forgejo and mirror to Codeberg to create redundancy and have public code that doesn’t eat so much monthy revenue, if they even have revenue.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Don’t underestimate legitimate contributions from people who only do it because they already have an account.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Let’s be realistic. Not everyone is going to move to Codeberg. Godot moving to Codeberg would be decentralizing.

    • nightlily@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s discussed in the Bluesky thread but the CI costs are too high on Gitlab and Codeberg for Godot‘s workflow.

      • e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That’s a shame. Did they take the wasted developer time dealing with slop into account in that discussion?