To go deeper: some animals act curiously, others with fear, but only a few of them understand what the mirror does and use it to inspect themselves.

    • certified_expert@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 minutes ago

      This is nothing else than the reflexion I am talking about. It is not a reflexion of you, the person chatting with the bot, but an “average” reflexion of what humanity has expressed in the data llms have been trained on.

      If a mirror is placed in front of another mirror, the “infinite tunnel” only exists in the mind of the observer.

  • Horsecook@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    There’s been an extensive marketing campaign to convince people that LLMs are intelligent. I wouldn’t call someone a subhuman for assuming there is some truth to that.

    Of those that understand what an LLM is, I think you can divide them into two groups, the honest, and the dishonest. Honest people see no use in a bullshit generator, a lying machine. They see it as a perversion of technology. Dishonest people have no such objection. They might even truly see intelligence in the machine, as its outputs don’t differ substantially from their own. If you view language as a means to get what you want, rather than a means to convey factual information, then lying is acceptable, desirable, intelligent. It would be difficult for such a person to differentiate between coherent but meaningless bullshit, and a machine with agency making false statements to pursue its own goals.

    • certified_expert@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      I disagree about the dichotomy. I think you can (1) understand what LLMs actually are. (2) See the value of such technology.

      In both cases being factual (not being deceived) and not being malicious (not attempting to deceive others)

      I think a reasonable use of these tools is as a “sidekick” (you being the main character). Some tasks can be assigned to it so you save some time, but the thinking and the actual mental model of what is being done shall always be your responsibility.

      For example, LLMs are good as an interface to quickly lookup within manuals, books, clarify specific concepts, or find the proper terms for a vague idea (so that you can research the topic using the appropriate terms)

      Of course, this is just an opinion. 100% open to discussion.

  • cally [he/they]@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Related: is there a name for “question bias”?

    Like asking ChatGPT if “is x good?”, and it would reply “Yes, x is good.” but if you ask “is x bad?” it would reply “Yes, x is bad, you’re right.”

      • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        It is not a leading question. The answer just happens to be meaningless.

        Asking whether something is good is the vast majority of human concern. Most of our rational activity is fundamentally evaluative.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Huh…so what you’re saying is that mirrors are actually AI.

    THAT MAKES A LOT OF SENSE!!! EVERYBODY COVER YOUR MIRRORS!!!

  • minnow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The mirror test is frequently cited as a means of testing sentience.

    OP I think you hit the nail on the head.

    • Aerosol3215@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Based on the fact that most people don’t see their interaction with the LLM as gazing into the mirror, am I being led to believe that most people are not sentient???

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Based entirely on the opinions of people on niche social media platforms, yes.

    • Carnelian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Except it’s not their reflection, it’s a string of phrases presented to you based partly on the commonality of similar phrases appearing next to one another in the training data, and partly on mysterious black box modifications! Fun!

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I like to describe it as a “force multiplier” along the lines of a powered suit.

      You are putting in small inputs, and it’s echoing out in a vast, vast virtual space and being compared and connected with countless billions of possible associations. What you get back is a kind of amplification of what you put in. If you make even remotely leading suggestions in your question or prompt, that tiny suggestion is also going to get massively boosted in the background, this is part of why some LLM’s can go off the rails with some users. If you don’t take care with what exactly you’re putting in, you will get wildly unexpected results.

      also, it’s devil tech so there’s that.

  • ameancow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Not nearly enough people understand this about our current models of AI. Even people who think they understand AI don’t understand this, usually because they have been talking to themselves a lot without realizing it.

    • certified_expert@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      lol, Is that the same gorilla that you see in other bathrooms? Or (like me) you meet a new gorilla every time you wash your hands?

      • GuyIncognito@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I think he’s the same guy. I used to try to bust him up but he just kept multiplying into more pieces and then coming back whole every time I saw a new mirror, so I eventually gave up

    • I’ve got a duck that prefers to dance in front of a chrome bumper or glass door where he can see his reflection than to go after any potential mates. Possibly he’s worshipping the mirror. Possibly he’s just really vain.

      • Wilco@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Uhmm … you never had a pet bird Im guessing?

        Seeing all bird masturbate up against a mirror is just par for the course when you have bird pets. Its gonna be either a mirror, a favorite toy … or you.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Animals aren’t cursed with the human ability to think our way into harmful and unproductive behavior due to conscious re-interpretation of information around us. Except for occasional zoo-animals in captivity that fall in love with inanimate objects.

        Something something about our species basically being in captivity.

    • Hux@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I love the idea of a bunch of woodland creatures (completely unaware of what mirrors are) investing heavily—and aggressively—in mirrors and mirror-related technology.

        • Hux@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Investor Squirrel 1: “All you have to do is gather your acorns right here, and they will instantly double in value!

          Investor Squirrel 2: “Bro’, we’re so sentient!!!

  • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    False. My reflection can’t tell me that pressing the Steam button and X will bring up the keyboard on Steam Deck’s desktop mode.