• idiomaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Clever. I wish I’d gotten a serious discussion out of this, but that’s the community.

    • ghurab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      But his comment is relevant the toppic.

      Modern industrial famring utilizes forced insemination with a tool operated by a human.

      A reasonable person could argue that it’s not sexual assault becuase the act was not for sextial gratification, but purely utilitarian in order to obtain a baby cow, disregarding the welfare of the cow.

      In other words, whether an act is sexual assault or not depends on the intentions of the actor, regardless of the experience of the subject and physical nature of the act.

      If you fill in “human” as your subject in the above formula, a reasonable person could conclude that the experience of the subject does, infact, matter.

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’m aware. I’m a vegan because I’m not down for animal rape. The bestiality laws are written with exceptions for people who are acting, not out of their own sexual interest, but out of financial interest.

        I wanted to have a slightly different discussion, because this one’s depressing as shit though.

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      14 hours ago

      A serious discussion about the ethics of bestiality? If that’s the kind of place you’re looking for I think you might have to create it yourself.

      • Tonava@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Honestly it would be really interesting to read that discussion, if it stayed objective and not divert to memeing. You can argue bestiality shouldn’t be forbidden by specific laws (but animal welfare laws) since if we make laws based on what we find gross, that’s how we get bans on homosexuality for example. Also you could argue that animals can actually consent in some ways, since if a male dog is willing to hump anything, isn’t that consenting? But then on the other hand in comparison if a person of limited mental capacity is willing to fuck anything, is fucking them ethical?

        Anyway, after writing that I find it important to point out that I’m personally aromantic asexual and absolutely do not want to fuck anything lmao. Though maybe that also has something to do with how I can look at these concepts from a distance, since they have nothing to do with me

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The keyword is informed consent, which requires full understanding of the situation. Children, animals, and impaired people can’t give informed consent.