• MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    okay so, first, were the CSAM websites illegal then? is the issue you see one of enforcement, not how the laws are written?

    • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yes, it has been illegal for quite some time. I’m guessing you are on the younger side?

      I’m the 90s clicking a link, even one with a legit looking url, could be a rather risky proposition. On slashdot and the like many of us would deliberately avoid many random links unless someone else commented about it first.

          • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            the text only music forums i was on in the 90s strangely didn’t have any problems with csam. it’s all where you congregate.

            • paul@lemmy.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              To be honest it probably did. There’s a whole army of broken heroes behind every social media site whose job it is to block and remove that kind of content. If you didn’t see anything, thank the admins.

              The problem with the kinds of people who are into that kind of stuff is that they want to shove it under your nose to make you uncomfortable.

              • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                God bless the poor bastards, because they permanently sacrifice themselves to save the rest of us from the absolute fucking worst.

                That is one of the few professions I would like AI to reliably take away.

            • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Lol, you don’t understand the internet, good person, but you are the physical embodiment of its current base.

              Step 1: Call fraud on a legitimate claim from someone who was there at the time.

              Step 2: Boast about your long, prolific history on the Internet to establish your credentials.

              Step 3: Double back because you stayed an a strangely singular lane, and as @paul points out, still avoiding getting it.

              Keep on keeping on, I guess.