• tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I’m willing to celebrate… if it’s a net positive in the end. Linux gamers being able to play big titles, or game with Windows-using friends is good. Having to run DRM/adware/rootkit “anti-cheat”, subscriptions and dark patterns is very bad.

    My outlook on the modern games industry is very low overall and I don’t see how to fix it. If I could do anything I’d instead promote and invest into “open source” games (software freedom respecting games).

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      That would all depend on both the Linux kernel accepting that to the upstream (which, let’s remember crowdstrike), and each distro not removing it. I sincerely doubt that is what this role is. This role is much more likely how to make anti cheat work in linux somehow without kernel access.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The kernal provides tools to inspect the system that userspace-only probably never can. So “works” here would be not crashing when it cannot investigate. The dev of the game Rust (which previously supported Linux) has brazenly said game devs are not serious about anti-cheat if they support Linux. Rust still has cheaters on Microslop Windows as kernal access isn’t even enough. Linux is better of not chasing the delution that is modern client side anti-cheat.