• v_krishna@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    19 hours ago

    English does the same with most vowels, it’s called diaeresis though the only place I commonly see it is in the New Yorker (funnily enough googling what it is called led me to a New Yorker article about it.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I mean at this point it seems that English doesn’t do this, but maybe at one point it saw limited use.

      Except “naïve”, that still happens. But English is nothing if not wildly inconsistent.

      • v_krishna@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Fair enough point, I also see it in normal English usage for proper nouns but basically nowhere else.

        Wikipedia agrees with you (and also calls out the New Yorker vehemently disagrees which I find oddly comforting and hilarious)

        In British English this usage has been considered obsolete for many years, and in US English, although it persisted for longer, it is now considered archaic as well.[3] Nevertheless, it is still used by the US magazine The New Yorker.[4]